All the comics from the new GPT have the same style, you don’t even need to pixel peep. They just all have the same art style.

Extra finger as well. Damn this one was good though, would’ve missed it if I hadn’t checked the comments and taken a closer look.

Edit: I can’t count apparently. If anything there are missing fingers.

Nice “gotcha”. But you know what I meant. We should discuss adding it as a sub rule - so we can report it for AI as they come.

When I’ve got 10,000 AI generated candidates on my ballot and its my job to pick out the half dozen real submissions, it feels like there’s a structural problem with the election’s process.

Lol I had no idea. Works both ways tbh

Damn, you’re right, artistic talent is totally required to make webcomics.

I apologise for my glib response. I don’t doubt your sincerity. Things may change in the future. It’s just that in this particular historical moment AI has as much to do with democratising talent as nfts did with supporting solo artists/creators.

I am sorry. This combination is no longer allowed. Internet gatekeepers have spoken.

edit: obligatory /s?

Dude pulling on native american person’s braid, mother and daughter look too similar, mom’s hand is messed up, SS logos are messed up

There’s a wave of AI generated comics hitting lemmy right now. At first i was in the same boat as you, found it difficult to identify

Now after seeing more and more, my brain’s detection algorithms are updating.

I’m quite good at seeing obvious AI slop images, but comics was a totallly new thing i had to learn to detect

The eyes, mostly. The braid thing is weird, too.

What ever you do, don’t look at the Native American’s eyes. 🥴

Yea, I don’t mind AI for personal use stuff like this. But AI in commercial stuff is a big no go.

Hands, faces, eyes, insignias. The usual shit.

Humans can make all art made by AI.

They didn’t say “A human could make this”, they said “I could make this.”

People use tools to achieve their goals more efficiently. It’s the way it always has been. It doesn’t mean there’s no value attached to it.

This counters another argument that wasn’t made. Sure, the end product has some value, but also comes with the negatives that some people see as intrinsic in the use of AI.

what are you picking up on?

https://suppo.fi/comment/9316305

What’s your point?

KOLANAKI

I don’t want to assume their gender but that’s a man, baby!

Must’ve trained the AI on Wheel of Time.

…he’s just following orders

I left another comment down there somewhere, but here’s something

The most obvious tell to me is that it looks more like a filter than a real drawing. So far all AI drawings look like this. There’s also details that I was able to pick apart:

• Why did the artist choose to draw everyone gazing into nowhere in particular, and not for example at each other?
• People have detailed faces, but their expressions seem unrelated to the message. Same applies to positions.
• The concentration camp victim is especially scared of something offscreen while the SS officer holding his shoulders, as if he was protecting this small man…?
• The artist chose to very clearly display the sheriff holding his fist in front of the native american, but for no apparent reason. Same for ICE.
• Why did the artist choose to use three victims in the last panel, making the composition weird and unbalanced.

Maybe it’s because of different amounts of exposure to AI stuff or something, but the only feeling I can get from this style and the empty stares is that something’s just off, and I hate looking at this so much.

Look at the Nazi insignia. It’s all AI garbled noise.

Weird eyes on the native American. The soldier/sherif is holding his braid for some reason.

The SS officer has garbled ensignias.

The faces of the immigrants are nearly just copy pasted.

That boy… oh boy… his eyes.

It was the eyes that gave it away for me. They look, just, wrong.

Something about trying to appeal to human emotions with robot creations doesn’t sit right sith me.

No, I just think it looks like shit

The sentiment of the post is right, but AI is shit and we can adress smaller shit while also focussing on big shit :)

There, said it to your internet face

Is it acceptable? Honestly I don’t know, it’s tricky.
It is not as if the picture is of real people that have been manipulated. Which is unacceptable . So, for me, it’s down to if the op couldn’t get their message across without it because, again for me, the message is far more important (at the moment).
And AI being shoved in to everything and up everyone’s arses is a problem for another day.

What I do know is that I posted my comment then read other comments and that most of the replies that mentioned AI were just mentioning AI. Some mentioned AI and the general message of the post. Some mentioned the message, but the majority and their replies were just about the AI.
Which, to me, means that OP’s message seems to be less important.
If op could draw themselves I don’t think they would have used AI.

A quick “fuck AI” then acknowledgement about the general meaning of the post is far more important, and on topic, than just mentioning AI.
The general message of this post has been steam rollered by other things, and it really shouldn’t be like that.

Smothering the human cartoonists and content creators in an avalanche of AI slop today guarantees you won’t have them tomorrow, when the AI tools are rigged to censor and pervert efforts at creating this kind of content in the future.

But the use of AI was a real thing that actually occurred.

Ya, a real artist could have gotten paid for this post!

… No? Get their cut off that sweet sweet Lemmy ad revenue?

I’m confused, in what way was an artist harmed by this? The artist that didn’t make this is missing out on their Internet points?

You should cry more.