Yunohost.

Perhaps it can give you a warning about that in the app. “Warning: Dingdong too long, offspring fountains in danger”

Didn’t say “ethical billionaire” anywhere, that’s a nonsensical word combination. Just wanted to point out there are differences in what should be done with an Elon Musk, Peter Thiel or Rupert Murdoch (who use their power, time and wealth to make the whole damn world a worse place for everyone for their own gain) compared to a Gabe Newell or George Soros.

Because

• Forbes doesn’t even list everyone
• There are rare cases of absurdly rich who don’t deserve harsh punishment (but deserve their fortune to be taken away and fairly distributed, of course)
• Taking info from a private company to do so would be… questionable.

Of course! That health data won’t sell itself.

(The device costs 600$, and to actually get access to your data you then have to pay at least 7$ per month in subscription)

Probably to collect all that it can to sell the data. Or they fucked up the feature and it triggers a connection attempt each second or sth.

Cancer survivor here. Nothing would make me more happy to see a simple cure for what almost killed me, the sooner the better. Even if it was just after I finished chemo; perhaps even especially right after it to be honest. Remember that there’s always the 5-year time where the danger of the cancer coming back is constantly lingering (especially during the first 12 months). Even if you just finished chemo, that new drug means you won’t have to go through chemo again for that cancer no matter what happens from now on. Nothing, and I mean abso-fucking-lutely nothing, would’ve given me more peace of mind at that time.

My guy, dude, bro, take your smartphone and put it far away from yourself if you don’t use it to look up anything before posting the wildest nonsense and whataboutisms. The demonstrations were huge back then, and even if they weren’t it would be utterly irrelevant to what happens now. The only thing you create with this kind of comment is even more division and hate and even question the legitimate outcry right now, even helping those who want to suppress it. Do better.

I’ll validate your naps if you want. They are very good naps. You are good at napping.

Lol, as if Telegram was even remotely better or would not bow to the EU.

I think the only safe bets would either be software that’s rather safe due to it’s FOSS nature (with servers outside of the EU), or those who simply do not give a shit. There’s als Signal clearly stating that if the EU does this their app will become unavailable, as they’d rather stop releasing their software to people than collaborating in surveillance and breaking their own secure protocol in some way.

Not to mention chatcontrol literally breaks both basic EU law, human rights as well as most national constitutions. They’d still try though, obviously. It would indeed shatter the current high trust in EU software.

Unfortunately it is only barely better in the EU, and not just because we use the same trashy US services. On the 14th of October the EU parliament decides about chatcontrol, and it doesn’t look too good right now. They’re close to completely eradicating trust of communication.

This is some prime authoritarian bullshit. Who needs properly declared laws and rules anyway, the current administration are “the good guys”, right?? They’ll just tell you if you’re wrong.

Oh, it’s a hint towards that fascist fuck idea.

That’s… I mean… is it optimism? Somehow it is, right?

I’d prefer any other format on the sole basis of “not maintained by <insert Corposcum>”.

Love how some people act as if cost-efficiency wouldn’t have to exist on a non-capitalistic society. Or imply that a country who’s literally fighting for its existence and peace only thinks about market capitalism or sth. 🙄

That’s way too generalized of a statement, even though I get what you mean. Things like infrastructure and mobility for example play a major part in how a city feels and develops. Tokyo, Amsterdam and Detroit are all cities but couldn’t be more different in nature, which in turn also shapes society and economy.

To think cities cause humans to just be themselves is as foolish as the foolishness your post was an answer to.

It requires very wrinkly brains to understand this though. People who argue for creationism as well as against democracy usually have very smooth, polished brains.

You don’t bet in achieving a pipe dream in the near future when developing something (at least I hope you don’t). The actual AI devs are also rather humble about what can be realistically achieved in the near future if they’re allowed to speak openly, it’s the techbros and investors who’re blowing everything up so phenomenally that the only way for this bubble - which by now is big enough to crash the US economy on its own - to proceed is to achieve the literally impossible, which is General Artificial Intelligence within at least the next 2 to 3 years (they can only pump so much money into it). I haven’t heard a single developer or scientist saying this to even be remotely realistic.

This is more about economics than programming, AI experts and grifters just collect the money as long as the bubble persist. Also has to do with tech-solutionism and latestage capitalism. In the end the science of Machine Learning will prevail (although a lot of devs might need to find other specialisations; perhaps COBOL?), but this economical house of cards will fall apart. Let’s hope it will burry US-neolibertarianism and -fascism under it this time.

Just one more GPT bro, I swear it will bring us AGI bro, please bro please, just one more GPT…