• 0 Posts
  • 131 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle





  • The imaginary hypothetical outcome is the version of you that would have happened without beatings. You stated that you felt corporal punishment had a positive impact on many aspects of your personality. What are you comparing it to? A hypothetical alternative version of you that hadn’t been beaten.

    Bad faith markers:

    • No previous post or comment history.
    • First post is on a contentious topic.
    • Sentiment of the post is unusual - “I don’t support it, but I was abused for an unusually long time and I think it was good for me”.
    • Call to action is particularly baity - “is it just a coping mechanism”.

  • First of all, I want to make clear that I strongly suspect that this is not a genuine question, and has been posted on bad faith.

    But to answer the question, the truth is that it’s impossible to know. You’re comparing a known outcome to an imaginary hypothetical one.

    The real question to ask is, even if it was the case, do the ends justify the means?

    Is it ever ok for an adult to physically attack a child in their care over, let’s face it, trivial matters?



  • I’d group Audi drivers and BMW drivers into the same class of obvious driving.

    Just yesterday I saw an Audi swoop from the slow lane straight into the fast last between two tightly-spaced cars in the middle lane. Without indicating.

    From a technical point of view, I’ll admit it was an impressively small gap to sneak through, but it probably gave the second car in the middle lane a heart attack.


  • The big difference between the US and China is that China is often close to the bottom of the supply chain.

    America doesn’t have the infrastructure already in place to supply the raw materials and basic essentials to manufacturers.

    Until this is the case (and I’m phrasing it optimistically but the reality is it never can be the case), all manufacturers have to pay extra just to have access to the things they need to produce their goods.

    This cost is passed on to the consumer.

    Like another commenter pointed out, there just isn’t a domestic supplier of many products. Crucial rare earth metals and various other minerals just aren’t available. Heck, to my knowledge, there isn’t even a domestic manufacturer of light bulbs anymore.

    Without putting anything in place before implementing these tariffs, he’s guaranteed that prices will go up on almost everything.


  • I agree with this entirely. I personally use AI to help me do things that I don’t have the time to do “the old fashioned way”.

    I can draw, paint, sing, sculpt, etc, and I enjoy doing all these things very much. But I don’t have time any more - I have a full-time job, two kids taking up most of my time, and Long COVID means I’m asleep for almost all of what would be left over.

    I’ve used AI to help me bring 2d art, music and 3d models into this world that would otherwise be trapped in my head.




  • I don’t agree with your take, sorry.

    To say that an artist should have exclusive control over a style is dangerous.

    Every time there is a big upheaval in an industry, it affects people’s jobs in that sector. Henry Ford’s investments in automation, put a lot of small car manufacturers in a tricky position. It also led to cars being affordable for most American households.

    I’m not unsympathetic, in fact I’m more than a little aware that AI will be taking over my sector, the software development jobs, within a couple of years (and unlike art, I can’t see any market for “hand-crafted” code!).

    But, the genie can’t be put back in the bottle. There’s no possible positive that comes from “calling out” AI art whenever you see it. It doesn’t help artists - if anything we’ve seen artists having to go out of their way proving their work isn’t AI.



  • Human artists train using other artists work. Every avenue of human endeavour is based on what came before.

    My own default style shares similarities with Barbara Canepa and Rumiko Takahashi. Why? Because, as a teen, I used to copy their stuff, trying to “unlock” the parts of it that I like.

    If I was to directly copy an image, and say it was my own, then that crosses over into stealing. But that’s not what has happened here. And unless you get very specific with the prompts, it’s not likely to happen.


  • Shocking truth:

    Humans can make all art made by AI.

    Humans can make all calculations made by computers.

    People use tools to achieve their goals more efficiently. It’s the way it always has been. It doesn’t mean there’s no value attached to it.

    Incidentally, for all of the “this is AI” brigade, what are you picking up on? I’m not picking up on any of the classic tells. Aside from the closed fists in the first and last image, where I’d personally go for an open hand, I don’t see anything obviously amiss.