I’m making some very basic chili. I have a can of black beans thats near expiry. Will adding it to my chili ruin it? It would be a 2:1 ratio of kidney beans to black beans.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t use either of those, generally. Pintos make the best chili, for veg or beef chili.

    But if making a chili with chicken, black beans are the best.

    You won’t wreck it, it’s chili. Taste and adjust till you like it.

    How long have you had these beans, that they are expiring? Don’t they last for years?

  • ductTapedWindow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh you’re looking to add black beans to your chili. That’s a fantastic idea, it will add flavor and nutrients that everyone will appreciate. You’re on your way to making the best chili. Go you

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, putting maple syrup on your pancakes is a deeply questionable act. By defaulting to it, you’re participating in a kind of culinary orthodoxy that treats one topping as the “correct” choice, quietly sidelining all other options as deviations rather than equals. It’s a breakfast-scale microagression, an example of how dominant norms establish themselves. What starts as preference hardens into expectation, and suddenly variety feels like rebellion. Maple syrup is an example of the tendrils of patriarchal control that permeate society.

      Furthermord, maple syrup’s status isn’t neutral, it’s culturally loaded, tied to a specific region and history, yet presented as universal. Elevating it above all else can be framed as a soft echo of colonial habits: taking something local, exporting it globally, and then acting as if it’s the default everywhere, while other tradition al toppings, lemon and sugar, fruit compotes, savoury toppings—are treated as secondary or quaint. The pancake, once a neutral base, becomes a canvas for enforcing that western colonial hierarchy.

      Lastly, drenching the pancake until it loses its texture and identity becomes a metaphor for dominance itself, imposing a single, overwhelming layer of conformity that overrides everything beneath it. In that sense, yes, it’s a bad idea not because of taste, but because of what it represents: Patriarchy, western imperialism, the literal smothering of non-western traditional culture, and suppression of individual expression into a homogeneous, predictable, passive and compliant regime.

      You should be ashamed of yourself for even suggesting this.

  • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    My simple philosophy on chili is to put whatever the hell you want in it as long as it has peppers, chili powder, cumin, oregano, tomato and beans. Meat too, if you like it. I’m sure purists would hate my chili but I don’t care.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Anyone who considers themselves a chili purist is out of their mind. That’s one of the most insane stances to hold.

      • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree, but they exist! The amount of people who take extreme stances on chili ingredients is wild.

        I just want something spicy, beany, tomato-y and meaty. At that point add in whatever you want.

    • timroerstroem@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I had never thought of putting cumin in my chili, but I could see that working. I’ll have to remember that. My top tip: Dark chocolate.

    • marquisalex@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Had a chili recently that had beetroot in - a little disconcerting when the juice has a bright pink tinge to it, but tastes good.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    Absolutely not - it’s a good idea

    It would be a 2:1 ratio of kidney beans to black beans.

    Perfect.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    You’ve probably had your chilli by now, but no-one else seems to have mentioned that canned goods are often fine long past their printed expiry date.

    Exceptions might include: rusty cans, because rust outside could also be inside; dented cans, because that might have created a weak point that could compromise the contents; and those cans with the ring-pull easy-open lids - ring-pull seals aren’t as good as the full seal of a can that needs a can-opener.

    And finally there’s always the look and smell test. Tip them into a separate bowl before putting them in the chilli. If they look and smell fine, then dump em in the chilli, with or without any liquid they might have been stored in.

    • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, any can that is domed - something inside is making gas that is pushing on the metal. Not good. Very, very bad.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, it’ll be fine. It may change the flavor profile a little bit.

    You may wish to look at some black bean chili recipes to check out the differences and see if you might wanna make some adjustments based on those. But it won’t be much of an adjustment.