No, it’s bait. The actual series is far more weird and not sexual. It devolves into these women with some sort of weird monkey man looking on and being tormented in the shower.
The artist did realize how popular this image has become, and has since pivoted to making only weirdly sexy photos of these women.
His name is Eugeny Hramenkov if you’re going to go searching.
Okay so this is from a goofy photo shoot by the extraordinarily talented musician Phoebe Bridgers as well as Maggie Rogers (whom I’m less familiar with) to promote a song they did together. What you’re talking about is a surreal photo series called “Understanding Joshua” by the artist Charlie White, which is about, among other things, post-coital depression and male body insecurity.
The image is from a porn, right? It has all the wrong signals showing.
No, it’s bait. The actual series is far more weird and not sexual. It devolves into these women with some sort of weird monkey man looking on and being tormented in the shower.
The artist did realize how popular this image has become, and has since pivoted to making only weirdly sexy photos of these women.
His name is Eugeny Hramenkov if you’re going to go searching.
Thank you but no thank you. I’m fine as I am. That is enough information for me.
Lmao ditto I have enough trauma 🤣
I know what you’re talking about but I don’t think that’s the same photo series. Now it’s driving me crazy and I need to find it.
Okay so this is from a goofy photo shoot by the extraordinarily talented musician Phoebe Bridgers as well as Maggie Rogers (whom I’m less familiar with) to promote a song they did together. What you’re talking about is a surreal photo series called “Understanding Joshua” by the artist Charlie White, which is about, among other things, post-coital depression and male body insecurity.
My parent constantly has post-coital depression.
Without knowing the source I’m unable to verify your statement
The girls did a brief interview about it.
It’s not a porn, it’s from one of their Instagrams, but they danced around the fact that it’s clearly tapping into some eroticism.
“some”
Yeah it’d be handy to know the source, to confirm. For science, of course.