• QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Legally speaking in the USA anything after the first is driving while intoxicated/under the influence (different states use DWI or DUI).

    Working in the booze biz you are sadly correct though. I had a wine rep a few years back offer to pay for my parking in NYC if I went to a tasting. I told him I was taking the train and he was surprised. He shouldn’t be.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You really don’t need to swallow at a wine tasting. In fact you’ll be able to taste a lot more without starting to affect your judgment if you don’t.

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Even spitting you still swallow a bit. Most in the trade spit at tastings into the spit buckets. You’ll be fine trying 5 wines in an hour but I would be tasting dozens of wines for hours. It adds up after a while.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      driving while intoxicated/under the influence (different states use DWI or DUI).

      I thought it was a matter of severity, with DUI being over the limit but not obviously impaired and DWI driving while there’s no doubt that you’re drunk, leading to more severe punishment?

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There’s actually been a trend of shifting the language to “owi” or “operating while intoxicated” since the law is the same whether you’re operating a car, a bike, a boat or a dump truck