That’s right, for hardware that’s now eight years old and never got a price discount. It currently sells for C$400 – but they’re about to jack the price.

There are Android tablets that are much cheaper than the Switch, more powerful, more battery efficient. Also, play games better.

Yet, Nintendo is jacking the price.

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The OP is really blowing smoke up Android’s ass when it comes to the quality of native Android games. Most “top” mobile games are freemium crap riddled with microtransactions.

    What it does have, however, is emulators. Including one for the Switch itself. Paying $350 for decade-old hardware and $80 for games is just bad value compared to a $300 used S21 and $0 games.

    • simple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If we’re going by piracy logic then you can buy a $200 used Switch and hack it to download games for free. I genuinely don’t think a phone or tablet would ever be a good experience. nobody is going to play with touch controls, it doesn’t let you play games on the TV, the emulator has compatibility issues and bugs, not to mention how most phones throttle hard when they get warm. I’m not buying this discussion at all.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, there’s no doubt about that. I’m not disagreeing that Android has some good-looking games. The problem is that games like GRID Legends Mobile are the exception, not the rule.

        The Switch is crap, yes.
        The Play Store is also overwhelmingly crap, though.

        If you exclude all of the mobile games from both stores, the Switch simply has a better catalog of games.

        • atomicpoet@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Let’s be real.

          Android’s problem isn’t lack of good games. Nor is it performance of hardware. It’s discoverability.

          But really, that’s also the problem of every storefront. Steam too has a lot of legendary games. But they’re also hard to find because shitty asset flips are so abundant.

                • atomicpoet@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Cyberpunk 2077 isn’t a fair comparison since the original Switch never had it. We’re comparing the original Switch to Android, not PC or PS5 to Android.

                  The problem with demanding exact “equivalents” is that it feels dismissive—like you’re rejecting games without giving them a real chance. Instead of chasing direct counterparts, focus on finding great games that stand on their own merits.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yeah, I agree with you on that.

            If discoverability was better, I’m sure Android would get way more ports of good games. With the way it is right now with shovelware and Google pushing microtransaction-riddled crap over one time purchase games, though, it’s treated as a second-class platform because it’s not nearly as profitable as other platforms.