DickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前Stinglemm.eeimagemessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1267arrow-down110
arrow-up1257arrow-down1imageStinglemm.eeDickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前message-square25linkfedilink
minus-squareboogetyboo@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前I’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 年前It was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
minus-squareDickFiasco@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前It’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前It’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise. However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget. But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
I’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
It was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
It’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.
It’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise.
However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget.
But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.