It’s already both happened to me that I didn’t notice I couldn’t move a piece without exposing the king or that I won by accident. Had the game not announced this, I wouldn’t have known.

And perhaps the opponent might not notice my mistake either. Or it could just be a strategic high-risk scenario, rather than a mistake.

  • Akasazh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    If you self-check, your opponents next move is always to take the king and win. Check means ‘if it’s my turn I can capture your king’.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      How is that different from resigning?

      The player can still draw by refusing to self check, right?

      • Player2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        26 days ago

        If you refuse to make a move, you resign, you lose.

        If you are unable to make a move, it’s a stalemate, you do not lose.

        It just gives you an extra chance to avoid a total loss by having your opponent make a mistake.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          Got it.

          A game that would normally stalemate because the only move is self check becomes a loss because you have a self check available.