It’s not a different “description”, it’s a fundamentally different set of rules governing how the facts are arrived at.

I mean, this is just factually wrong. Different types of authority are, very obviously, meaningfully different in more than just “backstory”.

If people are insulting you its because you’re just being pretty obnoxious and childish. It’s easy to get annoyed by someone who is convinced that they are right and everybody else is wrong, especially when they are so obviously wrong.

I mean, I assume you’re a troll? I don’t get offended by trolls. But I engaged with you here on the off chance that you’re not, hoping that you might see some reason. But instead you’ve just doubled down on your own crazy ideas. Like, best of luck to you (if you are indeed genuine), you seem relatively harmless. Try and broaden your horizons, it’ll do you good.

Nobody is taking you seriously enough to get offended.

Ok, I’m having a slow arvo so I’ll throw you a bone and try to explain what’s going on here.

Everything you’ve said here, you talk about as if it is a given that it’s true. e.g. “When you concentrate on a thing you ignore pretty much everything else. Do it enough and that ignoring becomes blindness. And habitual.”. The reason people are laughing at these claims is because its just provably false, at least as an ironclad rule. Most people know people or know of people that this just isn’t the case for. I personally know a bunch of scientists, artists and engineers who are highly successful at their job and also very well rounded people with a wide range of interests. Even if there was some general data on tendencies towards the kind of behaviour you claim, you don’t provide it.

So, the fact that your “unpopular opinion” is based on a fact that basically only you in the entire world believe to be true, means that everyone thinks your post here is nonsense, crazy, a very young child, or trolling. I assume you’ve had some experience with the kind of people you’re talking about, but even if every single person you ever met had this exact characteristic it would still be a hopelessly small sample size to make any claims about the population at large. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and you provide exactly zero proof for this extraordinary claim.

Why would I waste my time doing that.

There’s a difference between unpopular and nonsense.

Yeah the bleakness of From’s settings is definitely an inherent part of their worldbuilding.

Elden Ring has the deepest, most complex worldbuilding of any game ever made, and it’s not even close. For anyone interested in worldbuilding I strongly urge you to watch some Elden Ring lore videos from The Tarnished Archaeologist to learn about the techniques that the Elden Ring devs use to put incredibly deep and subtle worldbuilding into their games. It’s changed the way I think about worldbuilding in any context.

https://www.youtube.com/@tarnishedarchaeologist

As a young nerd obsessed with RPGs and William Gibson’s work I was outraged at the idea of putting fantasy into cyberpunk. But then I picked up a damaged copy of the Shadowrun rules from a bargain bin and was blown away by the worldbuilding, they really found a way to make it all fit thematically and logically and I ended up running the game for years.

The part you’re missing in this discussion is the way that modern social media systems are built to algorithmically encourage “engagement”, which almost always results in extreme and polarising opinions being pushed by the platforms. There are always shitty people in online spaces but those shitty people are disproportionately more visible in most social media because of the this.

The standard payment to an artist on Spotify is “$0.003 to $0.005 per stream”: https://simplebeen.com/artists-make-on-spotify/

That is basically nothing for any artist that isn’t in the top tier of mainstream success.

prior to Spotify coming along the industry was in decline as downloading MP3’s on torrents and file sharing programs was the norm

You’re essentially pirating music by using Spotify, you are not paying the artists that you listen to in any meaningful way.

I’m still getting a ridiculous amount of value from Spotify

If only the same could be said for the artists you’re listening to…

That seems extremely high, can you explain your listening habits? Are you listening to all of those albums start to finish? Are you selecting each of those albums or just letting the algorithm run wild?

Microsoft are charging a yearly fee to continue getting security updates for Win10 after EOL.

If you make a claim about something then the burden of proof is on you to support it.

You make several assumptions here with zero supporting data, e.g. “people do not generally live where there is a lot of potential to generate green energy”, “The more sources that can consume energy in remote areas the more incentives there are to build renewable energy sources.”.

Burden of proof is on you, bro.

#TheyDidntDoTheMath

deleted by creator

Should we examine our consciences and outlaw women’s healthcare in case people like this take offense and start a civil war?

This seems like a super confused take. Are you saying that killing healthcare CEOs shouldn’t be illegal?!