• 5 Posts
  • 188 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 13th, 2023

help-circle











  • In defense of this, there are situations where it’s good advice. Bullies that only use insults and social pressure are easily dealt with this way. Find a friend group with no connection to them, then ignore them to get rid of anything they can use against you. This is basically how I dealt with the people bullying me at school.

    But I agree, if they do anything beyond insults and social pressure, you need some way of confronting them or leaving them entirely.






  • A. Please tell me exactly where I said Biden was anything more than a mildly less shit alternative to Trump. And please tell me where I was saying support the genocide, rather than support one of the people who supports the genocide.

    B. I have not been talking about what Biden should have done. I have only been talking about what voters should have done.


  • A. I hate to do this, but

    The audience I wish to reach doesn’t need their hand held as a child

    Strawman, saying that this is about “leading people like they’re children” not “clear and effective communication as equals”

    B. What I’m talking about is proactively sharing your views, both to save time on questioning and to fill gaps that others would have never thought to ask about. Please, tell me why this isn’t a needed part of discussion.


  • The point of teaching is sharing knowledge, not just poking holes in whatever argument you can (intentional hyperbole, not strawman)

    The point of learning fallacies isn’t so that you can just name them and feel like you’ve made a point.

    strawman

    Instead of just “strawman, therefore you’re wrong” and leaving it at that, how about you explain what was incorrect in that statement. That way you become more understood, and everyone understands you more.

    This isn’t a courtroom debate. This isn’t a debate you “win” or “lose”. This is a debate where everyone should be trying to understand each other, so that everyone ends up better off by the end. This sort of debate is a cooperative thing, not competitive.


  • That’s the question I answered.

    Which would you rather support?

    • Genocide
    • Genocide + fascism + other bad shit (probably including genocide 2)

    Pick one or give an alternative and a good reason that it will have some effect.

    The lesser evil in this situation is genocide without all the other shit, and supporting that is therefore damage control