Chekhov’s cross

You also have the option of using c# in godot, if you prefer it to typed python.

Counter point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence

Thatcher standing right next to him

“Hot” I believe

Ah yes, because “lemmy” is one singular entity that would ever agree to work with reddit

Am I high or am I seeing that jar saying “nutolla”?

no shit

Incorrect, that’s quite a lot of shit

I’ve seen a retirement home with the same name

Don’t worry. I’m sure they’re sown shut

Universally we seek white liquid

He’s not wrong. There is absolute immunity for Trump friendly crimes, also known as presidential pardon.

My parents have a shed with all the shit that they have amassed over the years. Somehow my moonboot from 2016-17 ended up there, and I think it’s still there to this day. Along with other random things like a slide projector.

Religious people (especially monotheistic religions, not sure about pantheistic ones like Hinduism) have more reason to study science than non religious people. Everyone can get practical value from studying the world, but religious people also study science to learn more about God.

one of the main reasons is greed

It almost always is

Or we use binary to write all bases, since binary is the simplest. So English uses base 1010, and the alien is using base 100.

This system does break down when trying to use a base that isn’t a positive integer. I’ve heard of people trying to use base e (yes, as in euler’s number) for maths research.

Plus most of the rest of the Bible. I highly doubt that the political cult focused around a billionaire would approve of Amos, the book of the Bible all about God being pissed at Isreal for treating poor people badly.

A. It kinda depends who you ask. Some Christians are cessationists, meaning they believe the gifts of the spirit stopped happening after the apostles in the new testament. Those Christians will universally say no new scripture can be added. On the other hand, Catholics believe in papal infallibility, which means that in certain conditions (I’m not sure what they are, I’m not a catholic), the pope can make infallible doctrine, which is almost as highly valued as scriptural doctrine.

B. The list of books in the Bible has technically changed since the original canonization in the 4th century, but that was only removals like the apocrypha as far as I know. To add a new book, especially one written so long after the new testament was written, is basically impossible. It has been tried by the Mormons and arguably by Islam (although I don’t think they see the new testament letters as scripture so it’s another change on top of adding), but both of those changed so much that they’re no longer Christian.

I technically won’t say God can’t reveal more to humanity, enough to make another book of the Bible, but we already have the Bible, with no new additions for nearly 2000 years. If God was going to inspire more scripture, he probably would have done it by now.

The enshitification of search engines also doesn’t help with finding answers directly.

Not getting blastoise out for that job?