I agree, but if we could include the prong to base ratio of 4, that’d be great. I feel like 2’s head is to… idk, flimsy? Either the base should extend further or the prongs be shorter. Great shape otherwise though…
First off, I agree 4’s the shape is wrong. But imagine the head shape of 2 and the length of base and prongs as like 4? Clearly better than an unmodified 2 head imho.
Head of 2, body of 5.
Yeah, the actual fork bit of 2 is nice but I don’t like utensils with dump truck ass; they’re top heavy when in use.
This is the correct answer
This is the only correct answer
Nah just two all round
I agree, but if we could include the prong to base ratio of 4, that’d be great. I feel like 2’s head is to… idk, flimsy? Either the base should extend further or the prongs be shorter. Great shape otherwise though…
4 looks too spork like. No thanks
First off, I agree 4’s the shape is wrong. But imagine the head shape of 2 and the length of base and prongs as like 4? Clearly better than an unmodified 2 head imho.