Mee@reddthat.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 days agoWhat did Cory Booker 25-Hour speech actually achieve in terms of change?message-squaremessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up194arrow-down1message-squareWhat did Cory Booker 25-Hour speech actually achieve in terms of change?Mee@reddthat.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square54fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down3·2 days agothey elected oz in the very next session; using a filibuster to prevent his confirmation is how you use a filibuster effectively.
minus-squareBophades@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·edit-22 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 days agothe same way thurmond did it; you secure the votes behinds the scenes and then throw a filibuster when it’s time to vote to turn up the pain; not when there’s nothing on the table and no one around like booker did it.
minus-squareBophades@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-22 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoThey shook hands and unanimously approved (booker too) more weapons for the genocide immediately after the performance.
they elected oz in the very next session; using a filibuster to prevent his confirmation is how you use a filibuster effectively.
deleted by creator
the same way thurmond did it; you secure the votes behinds the scenes and then throw a filibuster when it’s time to vote to turn up the pain; not when there’s nothing on the table and no one around like booker did it.
deleted by creator
They shook hands and unanimously approved (booker too) more weapons for the genocide immediately after the performance.