• chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t disagree, but I don’t see how you can do that. Well, I kind of do, that’s by “taking the word back”, poisoning the meaning of the word or its association so that hateful people won’t want to be associated with it. I know it’s definitely not shaming people for calling out that it’s a dog whistle. Because, again, that puts the moral failing on the person calling it out rather than the people who gave it the negative association to begin with.

    That quickly becomes “ugh, these fucking SJWs policing everyone’s speech” instead of “ugh, these fucking losers ruining perfectly good words with their hatred”, which it should be.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I agree there isn’t an easy answer, I just don’t think giving them power over the words is actually helping anyone, because it does turn into the SJW situation like you pointed out.

      Humungus Wut intensifies

      It devolved into people MAKING problems were there wasn’t actually one by assuming negative intent.