"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-210 months agoGravid vättelemmy.worldimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down11
arrow-up1414arrow-down1imageGravid vättelemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-210 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarehemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up51·edit-210 months agoThe best guess I could find online about these with 5min search Sorry for r*ddit
minus-squared00ery@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-210 months agoAlthough, I think safety matches are ones that will only strike on the rough side of the box, rather than a wall or chin stubble. But I rather like the idea that they have matches that don’t burn all the way down. https://www.britannica.com/science/safety-match
minus-square"no" banana@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 months agoYes! I missed that part. It’s correct that it means that they only strike on the rough part of the box. The safety being in the fact that they don’t spontaneously ignite.
minus-square"no" banana@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-210 months agoYep. That’s pretty much correct. Edit: except for what the comment above says about the safety part.
The best guess I could find online about these with 5min search Sorry for r*ddit
Although, I think safety matches are ones that will only strike on the rough side of the box, rather than a wall or chin stubble.
But I rather like the idea that they have matches that don’t burn all the way down. https://www.britannica.com/science/safety-match
Yes! I missed that part. It’s correct that it means that they only strike on the rough part of the box. The safety being in the fact that they don’t spontaneously ignite.
Yep. That’s pretty much correct.
Edit: except for what the comment above says about the safety part.