Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agoExpertiseslrpnk.netimagemessage-square99linkfedilinkarrow-up11.47Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.45Karrow-down1imageExpertiseslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square99linkfedilink
minus-squarebananabenana@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·3 years agoHasn’t read the article methods but still decided to comment: cOrReLaTiOn dOeSn’t eQuAl cAuSaTiOn
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 years agohttps://xkcd.com/552/ Correlation doesn’t imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing ‘look over there’.
minus-squareioen@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 years agoThere’s a generation of internet debate guys who seem convinced that correlation disproves causation
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 years agoYeah but also just publishing correlation is a shitty practice. That’s supposed to be a hint to look deeper, not the end conclusion.
Hasn’t read the article methods but still decided to comment: cOrReLaTiOn dOeSn’t eQuAl cAuSaTiOn
All my literal this
deleted by creator
https://xkcd.com/552/
There’s a generation of internet debate guys who seem convinced that correlation disproves causation
herp doesn’t imply derp
Yeah but also just publishing correlation is a shitty practice. That’s supposed to be a hint to look deeper, not the end conclusion.