• deft@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        No and it’s fucking stupid to say it is because they’re both yellow. That’s probably more racist than the image.

        This is the origin. Which is from Chinese social media. It only became known in the west because China banned this imagery. So now posting him as Winnie the Pooh is directly a mockery of China’s strict information control and running around calling it racist is dumb.

        You’re reaching for this one.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m going to share this Reddit comment about a Dutch tradition where people used to wear blackface.

          https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/s/CdonBFsbVJ

          To be short, it doesn’t really matter what the original intent was. There are too many parallels to racist tropes, and now we have people who insist that it’s not racist because they actually want to do dog whistles. So now this thing that maybe didn’t start as a racist thing, now definitely is.

            • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 minutes ago

              The point of that example was how something was racist even though it wasn’t originally intended to be racist or the people doing it were intending to be racist.

              Chinese people don’t use that meme anymore. It’s almost exclusively foreigners. And in that context, with the history of racist yellow caricatures, the meme is racist. It’s honestly odd that you’re defending it this much.