

2·
4 days agoThere is no universally agreed-upon legal definition of “right” or “wrong.”


There is no universally agreed-upon legal definition of “right” or “wrong.”


also
Popper did not advocate for pre-emptive censorship or deplatforming of fringe ideas themselves.
The paradox applies specifically to ideologies that seek to disallow debate entirely and dismantle open, democratic institutions.
not all “bigots” are against debate or democratic institutions.
also being any <pejorative> is subjective


what type of nose is that?
wait which feddit there are multiple of them
but according to guardian, “Bigotry” is really just a name for any opinion with which you happen to disagree.
and in your link “debate” is not mentioned