Yes, but do yourself a favor and wait a few years so you don’t stunt your brain growth

Swimming? Still requires a towel, just not for sweat

I have zero evidence to support this, but it could be government contractors saving money by reusing and slightly modifying building plans between actual prisons and schools? My high school building could definitely have been a prison with some adjustments. Total speculation though.

nice try, cat

Pukey jade

It’s a gnuke

Sounds like a special dog. I’m sorry.

I don’t agree with putting down a dog pet unless they’re suffering. If a dog pet is in pain and there is no hope that they’ll recover, death can be mercy. It’s never not terrible. But your feelings aren’t the priority in that situation.

Just don’t ever do it at the vet - find someone who can come to you so there’s no extra stress

fuck this is depressing

edit: dog -> pet

The NATO alphabet comes in handy sometimes

So then does trust == faith?

Of course it’s not possible to understand absolutely everything, even as a well-informed scientist or academic. You say ‘blindly trusting’, but may be that’s quite the right way to put it, since, presumably, you have determined that those experts know better than you do, i.e. it’s not ‘blind’ in some sense. Whereas a religious person may blindly have faith that there is a God and a higher purpose (or whatever).

That said, to counter my own point, I’m sure there are plenty of religious people who determine that their religious leaders or experts are worthy of trusting because of a perceived higher spiritual connection, social status, or similar.

I think it all comes back to being able to think critically. In my mind at least, the word ‘trust’ implies some sort of rational thought process, whereas ‘faith’ has a bit more of an emotional connotation. But in reality it’s probably more of a heavily-overlapping Venn diagram (assuming there’s a distinction at all).

Generally I agree that it can be an incredible tool for learning, but a big problem is one needs a baseline ability to think critically, or to understand when new information may be flawed. That often means having at least a little bit of existing knowledge about a particular subject. For younger people with less education and life experience, that can be really difficult if not impossible.

The 10% of information that’s incorrect could be really critical or contextually important. Also (anecdotally) it’s often way more than 10%, or that 10% is distributed such that 9 out of 10 prompts are flawless, and the 10th is 100% nonsense.

And then you have people out there creating AI chat bots with the sole intention of spreading disinformation, or more commonly, with the intention of keeping people engaged or even emotionally dependent on their service — information accuracy often isn’t the priority.

The rate at which AI-generated content is populating the internet is increasing exponentially, and that’s where most LLM training data comes from currently, so it’s hard to see how the accuracy problem improves going forward.

All that said, like most things, when AI is used in moderation by responsible people, it’s a fantastic tool. Unfortunately, the people in charge are incentivized to be unscrupulous and irresponsible, and we live in a decadent society that doesn’t exactly promote moderation, to massively understate things…

(yeah, I used an em-dash, you wanna fight bro? 😘)

I stand corrected, TIL!

historicity

I think you’re looking for the word “history”

edit: sorry… I try not to be that guy, but I couldn’t help myself

They smell like developer fluid (fixer?), and so will your clothes after you’ve been in there long enough… the red light you always see in the movies isn’t common—the dark rooms I’ve been in use amber colored lights. Come to think of it I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone use an enlarger in a movie or TV show, they always just cut right to the paper in the developer