Whatever brings that crazed warlord out of hibernation is good for me. There are a handful of youtubers who have tried to ape the style, but nobody has managed to replace sseth.

Didn’t like his recent top down shooter reccomendation though. The reload mehanic is needlessly complicated, three button presses plus a timing minigame. I can appreciate penalizing early reloads by losing the rest of the mag/clip, I can work with manual reloads, and while I don’t like quicktime event reload mechanics I can tolerate it.

But press R to start the reload, press E to eject the mag, then time your R press to reload faster? Too much for me alongside all the other mechanics.

Personally, I’m waiting for the long feet episodes

I thought you said you weren’t going to entertain people for free, but you’ve been putting on delightful clown show for over a day now.

They don’t deserve your attempt at good faith. OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and poor use of AI.

OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and poor use of AI.

OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and poor use of AI.

OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and poor use of AI.

Nope, people downvoting because OP is a twat.

Habitually uses AI to remove credit and artist signatures from all the comics they post. Blatantly breaking the community rule of a max of two posts per day. Openly admits they could choose to include source on all their posts, but refuses to until this community adopts their personal batshit definition of “advertisement” (any reference to the artist in the image/comic itself) and makes it a rule that anyone who posts a comic with attribution in the comic itself gets banned.

https://lemmus.org/comment/17166866

Their recent post and comment history is a goldmine of a meltdown.

That’s perfectly logical, and I agree entirely.

The issue lies in the problem user OP is trying to address with this rule. Beep has stated that they won’t consistently attribute sources until the community implements the rule they want enforcing that users strip attribution out of the image itself: https://lemmus.org/comment/17161116

Hooray dumb internet drama!

OP does not deserve your benefit of the doubt, unfortunately. They intentionally strip credit out of nearly every comic they post, often using AI to do so, and clarified themselves in the comments of the post I linked that they do include artist signatures in their definition of “advertisement”. It was brought up because the user has a history, not because people jumped to wild assumptions.

OP also says that they won’t do the simple thing of attribution through link in the body text unless the community adopts their unhinged rule: https://lemmus.org/comment/17161116

The OP has stated that they won’t consistently attribute sources, even in the way you suggest, until the community implements the rule they want enforcing that users strip attribution out: https://lemmus.org/comment/17161116

They don’t deserve your benefit of the doubt, unfortunately.

Yes. Unfortunately, proving intentionality in smaller cases than beep may be difficult. But it’s useful as something to lean back on when it’s obvious/egregious like their case.

First step would be enforcing the existing rules lime two posts per day per user, imo.

OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and other means.

This is a comic by beetlemoses.

OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and other means.

OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.

https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and poor use of AI.

In less terminally online terms: “I think they’re a member of a US intelligence agency doing some vaguely psyop thing, not a normal poster”

So, you still don’t understand why it wouldn’t be appropriate to react strongly in a room full of kids is what you’re saying.

It’s not an ad hominem when calling out your inability to comprehend the reason for that is the entire point to my comment. It highlights a severe deficiency in your social awareness at the bare minimum, which doesn’t reflect well on your ability to discern the motives of other people online. Does that spell it out directly enough?

Fine, let’s put that aside. In your eyes, what would have been an appropriate response for Bush to take in that situation? This ought to be entertaining.

OP thinks that artist credit is an ad. https://lemmus.org/post/21226925

Maybe you should abide by the two posts per person per day rule before you start trying to create new ones.

But do go on and tell everyone how an artist having their name and/or their webcomic’s name included in the image is an advertisement.

Especially when it’s damn obvious that you’re using AI to remove the attribution when you can’t just crop it out. Not just a weasel, but a lazy one at that.

So… you fully admit that you could do the right thing, but just won’t?