I mean that, if all DNS servers just returned whatever the root servers tell them, nobody would want to run his own one, I think.
Runterwählen ist kein Gegenargument.
[Verifying my cryptographic key: openpgp4fpr:941D456ED3A38A3B1DBEAB2BC8A2CCD4F1AE5C21]
I mean that, if all DNS servers just returned whatever the root servers tell them, nobody would want to run his own one, I think.
For the record, any DNS server you choose to employ should default to only using the root servers.
If that was the case, there would be a market for exactly 0 DNS servers.
You should also be aware that even if you use root servers, a DNS server which is authoritative for the domain you are querying may well return different results depending on where in the world you are.
Thank you, this is valuable information to me. :-)
Blocky is another nice AdBlocker and DNS proxy.
Blocky does look nice, but there is no way to use it without any upstream DNS server, which limits its usefulness. Technitium (like Unbound) works without having to rely on third-party DNS services, which is its main selling point, I guess.
Yes, it’s running on a Raspberry Pi. Only internal SD, no other services. RPi 3B, I think. It’s been mine for quite a few years now.
Then again, US-American English is not exactly the most sophisticated sounding language either.
Well, VPS then.
What would be a “not personally setup”?
Both, somewhat. It is a virtual root server. I’m still considering to consolidate - at least - my OpenBSD servers into one, but I’m lazy.
My backup server is the only one of my servers that is located outside Germany. You know, in case the British come again. Or the data centre of my other servers burns down. Or something like that.
Every night, this server receives a (compressed, incremental) backup of the most important data (content and configuration files) from each of my other servers, which I created with Borg.
I haven’t been able to try Linkding on any of my servers yet, as neither OpenBSD nor OmniOS are supported. I would probably like it if it did.
Of course, all of this is just a personal preference.
Working on my better Hoarder alternative. Goal: maybe 2025.
Honestly, what I use is not what I would recommend. ;-) My own setup follows these directions (TL;DR: OpenBSD, as much OOTB OpenBSD software as possible, and Dovecot.)
I am happy to recommend it to others.
If they ever support non-Docker systems again, I might be curious. Right now, I couldn’t even use that.
Note that you don’t know what the hosters know, store and/or sell about you.
I’m glad that you see my point that “other people hosting your data” is not really a good idea.
They host software for anyone to use, and capture all the data, usage patterns, etc, for themselves, to use for their benefit, and to use against you.
So I guess that we can agree that data stored on other people’s computers will not be safe. I honestly wonder why you think other people’s computers are safer if you know their names.
And you want to sit here and tell me they’re the answer?
I would be very grateful if you would only judge what I have written and not what you think I might have meant.
Are you just an apologist for FAANG, etc?
There is no reason to attack me personally, my friend.
Who’s paying you to post this disinformation?
Just in case I’m fundamentally misunderstanding your personal attack so I don’t report it to the moderators without cause: What is ‘disinformation’ about my pointing out that Google and Facebook host software for other people (even if they have their own motives)?
every community has somebody in it who does the self-hosting for the community
That’s what (e.g.) Google and Facebook do: Host software for the community.
Ah, sorry. This is a new technology to me. Thank you!