I hate to break it to you but… millennials are old

Or more generally, anything that has a beginning has an end

Come on. Public figures need to be able to deal with satire and mockery, and this isn’t even a deep cut. Besides, have you seen how Miyazaki treats his family? That man has no empathy or humanity to offer his peers either. He’s a stuck up old man that would do well to come down to earth.

Sounds to me like Miyazaki needs to lighten up.

4-hour planning? I wish. Try 16-hour planning.

And also, a meeting to plan for the planning meeting.

The alot looks like it could easily eat 7 tacos and still be hungry

Well it works fine in boost

“There’s more than one way to skin a cat.”

1. You have a cat.
2. You wish to remove its skin.
3. You realize there’s more than just one method to accomplish this unusual task.
4. You state this proudly as a metaphor for problem-solving flexibility.

What’s the story with this guy?

I mean Adobe is a piece of shit company and if there’s any way you can ditch them, do it. If you can’t, I get it. In that case a Mac is probably the easier way out.

Yes, there are certainly alternatives and there are several with a better UI than GIMP (see Krita and Pixel). But I’ve been told there are specific tools and workflows that are missing. Partly it’s probably a matter of finding new ways of accomplishing your goal.

Ubuntu is the typical go-to replacement for Windows as it’s arguably more plug-and-play than other distros.

alternativeto.net is a great place to find Linux alternatives to the software you use. Many products already work on Linux without switching, but some areas might be more difficult. For example depending on your needs you might not find a great drop-in replacement for Photoshop.

Please, you’re wasting your time explaining. I know all this. I’m talking about how a libertarian would interpret the question due to its ambiguous phrasing. My only point is that of the original parent comment: the methodology of the researcher is bad.

No, 0.05$ is not a substantial amount of money. A 5 percentage points tax increase could be considered substantial. The question is worded so that it can be interpreted in the latter way, and it’s also using a subjective word like “substantial”. Somebody who is politically against taxes is likely to interpret it the latter way, and hence the poll’s results are skewed by its vagueness.

If we want to measure math skills and understanding of the law, a better question would be by how many dollars the total tax would increase. This would also give us better information on how far off people are.

I mean I understand all of these things. But the question is worded in a way that can be interpreted wildly differently depending on the political affiliation of the person responding.

Yeah what does “substantially” mean in this context and what are we even measuring? In terms of percentage units, the step from 28% to 33% is definitely a substantial increase. The question doesn’t specify whether we’re talking about total dollars paid or just how much the tax percentage increases in that bracket.

They’re basically “republicans light”: still bad but at least not literal nazis

Is it really “not safe for work” if everyone at work is in on it?

Her dog.

ThinkPad is a work tool. MacBook is a fashion statement.