cifi is probably more idle than you want, but it’s good for an idle incremental.

Obelisk Miner is more a clicker, but reasonably fair to play with little or no micro transactions.

Idle kingdom clicker building out your kingdom and exploring the maps was pretty fun. The grind gets pretty extreme in the later worlds though.

Super toss the turtle adds a prestige system to the classic flash game.

1. Marriage generally doesn’t result in tax savings, you’d need an extremely specific scenario for that to be true.
2. Marriage is the most legally significant thing most people will do in their life except die, it’s expensive and time consuming to undo if you want to later.
3. Marriage gives real rights to the other person, just because you treat it like roommates doesn’t change that. It’s complicated to prevent a spouse from inheritance or medical decisions. Community property states could make you liable for their debts.
4. If it’s just for health insurance, try to get coverage without marriage. It’s probably easier to go the marriage route, but it’s sometimes possible to get exemptions or companies that allow a non married domestic partner.

It an investment return problem as much as a technical one. A computer could maybe reduce a team of 6 to a team of 2, saving optimistically 500k/year. The cost of building that system is likely at least ten million, putting a break even at 20 years minimum. When you factor in the costs of maintenance and running the program, it’s going to make it take even longer. Also because it’s not actually a solvable problem, you have to pick an accuracy level you are comfortable with, too low and you need too many people fixing things anyway, too high and people are cheaper.

You aren’t going to benefit from fixing it anyway so who cares.

The fascist dystopia of watchmen allowed cops to be completely anonymous for their safety, but still restricted officers access to firearms. We’ve blown past the parody at this point.

Dino ranch isn’t a bad choice either.

The problem with train scheduling is that computers don’t just make it better. There’s a very real chance computers could make it worse or result in approximately the same outcome but not require millions in investment into a new system.

Endless arguments about a new engine vs even more duct tape on the creation engine. Starfield was a tech demo of their latest updates.

My state is paper ballots and a tabulator that just counts the bubbles for each candidate, so everyone gets one. They have a computer based option for accessibility, but I believe that also prints ballots.

Nintendo got a lot of hate and took a big loss with the palworld lawsuit.

You can use the same save file. The devs did recommend starting over though as a lot has changed. You can use the global palbox to store pals you want to transfer between saves.

International students at US universities are 1% genius level students with full ride scholarships and maybe even grants. 5% student athletes with full rides, and likely NIL packages now. 94% children of rich parents that can afford the full tuition price and an apartment + allowance for their children.

I’m only buying dlc for games I already have.

Yes, but they aren’t as young of an audience maybe idk. One bad thing in common isn’t too bad.

It comes down to jealousy. A manager can’t possibly make less than their direct reports is a common thought process, especially when both positions are salaried. Some companies are willing to buck the trend and pay at least first or maybe second level managers less than some of their reports at times.

It’s actually somewhat common for roles with commission or tips to make more than management. This also happens with roles that get paid overtime.

I’m not saying it isn’t a problem, I’m saying it’s been used as justification for things that have little to do with climate change.

The vast majority of climate focused policy and arguments has nothing to do with climate change. A significant portion is lightly re themed malthusian arguments. Another significant portion is people wanting to change society to their preferred version.

I’d skip the middle man and put them in the trash.

More proof this is the dumbest timeline.

Blaming the Republicans for the Democrats is exactly the point the OP is making. Nixon and Reagan didn’t make Clinton rape anyone, order an illegal war, or likely have dissidents murdered. They didn’t make Obama also engage in an illegal war in Libya. Those were choices they decided to make, they had the option to be better.