I mean they dropped the parts of ip4 that are not used. They only multiplied the number of bits by 4, otherwise it’s the exact same ideas. The confusing part might be that a device gets multiple addresses off the bat. Using decimal for 128 bits would have made the address even worse.
Probably not worth pirating, will still run like crap.
Forgetting about it is probably the best insult you can give it.
I’ve always assumed it depends on what your context is. If your perspective is the country that the immigrant is from, then they would be an expat. If you are in context of the other country they are an immigrant.
Ie
“My friend is an expat who went off to The Netherlands.” “My friend is an immigrant that came here from The USA.”
If they don’t, that’s something you can’t blame on a new start.
Pretty much, add the new domain to certbot, then create a new server directive with the new name and certificate paths. I would probably just copy and paste the existing one for your current domain, then just change the domain. SNI will then select the right certificate for you.
You can set certbot to create a single certificate with both domains, but tbh the above is just simpler to setup and maintain.
Server '03 was also pretty solid, didn’t have some of the weird aspects of xp.
Well yea ofc it works like that, the services are not on the same network, so the packets need to be sent onto another adapter. That means either nat or forwarding tables.
Now if that was a good design of docker is another question.
They are still in use as multicast. Typically it’s for local traffic.
I don’t think multicast over the internet would have taken off as multicast requires all routers between the source and any destinations to be multicast aware. Each would need to keep track of the subscriptions, meaning more resources that would mean higher cost. There was also less interest as one of the pluses of internet delivery was that delivery was on demand.
In the end cdns were going to be created anyway for static content and streaming could just use the same systems to produce effectively the same improvements.
But your next question would be why have they not done it for the experimental range.
Well, everything knows those packets are not on the internet so will block them. If you want to ask the internet to upgrade everything for that, well just ask how the ip6 upgrade is going.
They no longer require authy for time based codes, so I would update to use an authenticator app when you next get in.
Some commercial waste disposal does sorting of recycling out of the waste, they will even ask for it to not be separated prior so that they don’t have to transport it separately.
This is typically why you see this.
Whether that is a better way of doing it I don’t know.
I’m more impressed that ms didn’t write this as a 150MB binary than anything else.
That sounds roughly related. I see ones like: excel file broken!!! Actual issue: it’s dark so the computer screen is too bright and when they put sunglasses on due to the brightness, they can’t read the numbers. Solution is to turn the lights on.
The first half sounds so true to me. Like it was an intern that really wanted a replica set, but instead of using the same platform the company was using, hacked together something running on Linux. Ofc they didn’t tell anyone how it worked, and everyone else knew windows server so no one poked it.
It used to be running on a spare pentium 4, but was virtualized as no one knew why things stopped working when it was turned off
The printed sheets on the wall looks a bit too good as well.
Saving it for what? If they are not using it anyway it’s not going to get used later either.
I see people be like “can we use b: for the backup drive” and it just feels wrong.
Actually looks like an anti removal screw. The inner edges of the plus are sloped, but only in the direction to unscrew.
It’s less of a main, and more of a “don’t do this if being imported.” You can just throw code without that block and it will run.
Sounds like it’s perfectly replicated the help forums it was trained on.
What is the server are they on?
If they are just on a windows server, then the indexing service is actually good for fast results on a network share. If it’s a windows 10/11 pc, I think you need to enable classic search for it to provide results to clients over the network.
Alternatively I believe everything (the program) supports indexing network locations.