so 3 different agenda, with the same result. Probably it is as coincidental as that
so 3 different agenda, with the same result. Probably it is as coincidental as that
astute observation. Zuckerberg with all his new 'masculine energy" stuff, could still fit in your approach: he dont accept his woman side
yeah may be it’s just rich people having a louder voice . But trans existed for a long time, and we never heard so much vitriol against them until a few decade back
very interesting take. Thanks
she seems pretty vocal about it : https://theweek.com/feature/1020838/jk-rowlings-transphobia-controversy-a-complete-timeline
I get it. But that smokescreen is achieved with anti-immigrant rhetoric. Throwing Trans in , seems so random
You might be right: it’s a rebranding of anti-gay sentiment.
In French we have “a burned cat fear cold water” (chat échaudé craint l’eau froide)
most real-life villain thinks they are doing good. JK Rowling rhetoric is all about “protecting women”. She probably is certain she is some sort of martyr trying to save the world