Isn’t it always different things? “Magic” being a different set of rules for how the world works. Technology being the things that can be achieved given the rules. And, whether advanced technology is influenced and how, depend on those rules, lore and culture.
If for example magic is only available to some people with the ability or what not. Technology will always be available regardless.
I think you skipped part of the sentence.
I think they’re referring to the online experience. Every single post about some “woman who does something intelligent / skillful”, with enough attention (and it doesn’t take much!), will contain guys being absolute shits.
Seems like the confusion can be attributed to assuming the discussion was limited to “being outside”.
I got the lifetime pass 5 years ago. I’ve switched to JF because of the disappointment so far about a year ago.
JF is exactly what I wanted and needed plex to be, and everything added since is a worsened product. The lifetime pass was an attempt at getting the peace of mind of “then you just have it”. If anything, only FOSS can give that.
I’m going to give an explanation, without having a single clue as to whether or not is accurate.
Encryption keys can have many layers, baking in different expiration dates. Rotating one might be required without needing to rotate all.
MH: World is the only MH game I tried, out of curiosity. It ended up on my library at some point as a PS+ game. Got through the initial “story” thing, if you can call it that. The tutorial. Getting to the camp. The mandatory chat with 10 different people. Did the first real “hunt”.
It seemed to mind bogglingly boring, that after that mission, I just uninstalled the game.
Wilds looks amazing. Which makes me wonder if the games are sufficiently different that it might be worth give it a chance.
It’s actually a bit refreshing for the US president to be so dumb as to say the quiet parts out loud.
Out of curiosity, were you of voting age in 2016?
The argument is that the explanation was valid, and whether or not you found it valid, is more to do with your inability to get it. Now, this isn’t saying anything about you, because you might get it. So, the “you”, is not the particular you, but rather “one such that would meet the requirement”. But hey, you do you.
I’ve made no statement about you. So, your response is a bit weird.
Don’t conflate an argument being unclear, with you having trouble understanding it
The trick is to not consider meta products to be a viable option. What you are left with is the actual playing field.
Sure, but, what does that have to do with the AI answer? Wait… Are you an AI?
I see. That’s not what “security by obscurity” means in my world, but the expression certainly sounds like it could. It’s not like I own the meaning of words, so it’s interesting to hear what it means to others. Could also have been meant figuratively, I suppose.
In what way does “security by obscurity” apply here?
Hadn’t heard of it before. Searched for it, and came across both Path of Diablo, and Project diablo. Some polls suggested preferring the latter 2:1. I haven’t played D2 in a few decades (sheesh). Any thoughts on comparing those mods?
“Install Linux”, is usually a hurdle for most people. We should be willing to help with that part.
Maybe this was an intentional leak. Now the Nintendo lawyers can claim they’ve used stolen proprietary code?
Hm. I was thinking of the problem in terms of “what is”, and not so much “what it looks like”. SG-1 is a good example, where the argument is that there is no actual magic. Its “sufficiently advanced = looks like magic” not “… = magic”.
I interpreted the question to consider actual existence of magic. So, I suppose it hinges on how “magic” is actually defined. Where I thought it would be some kind of forces / energy that is manipulated by will or tools. Hm… I suppose this is a lot more nuanced.