Is this surreggacy?
I try to contribute to things getting better, with sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
Is this surreggacy?
What will they do with the money?
I’ve never seen one with the hole aligned exactly at the right place.
Do you use special kinky kayaks with an opening at the butthole level?
Second had nice ideas too but very different, not a coorpg anymore and more an actually MMO. PvP was very disappointing, they didn’t keep anything from the 1, probably because it was too elitist. For me the massification made me feel like I was insignificant, I didn’t like it much, I did a bit of the campaign and that’s it.
I think it’s a much much smaller player base. It was successful, but WoW was a mind blowing success.
Such a great online game with original ideas and one of the most diversed and interesting PvP of its genre.
Also a bit buggy in Firefox desktop on Linux.
Damn, I didn’t know Reuters produced this kind of graphical article, it is really cool.
Only if they come from Wink, Winkler County, Texas. Otherwise they are just sparkling eyelead carrier and receiver.
Agreed, especially if you’re writing to someone who’s not completely fluent in the language. Also use short sentences and common vocabulary.
Edit: Couldn’t see the other pictures, but it was just slow to load.
That’s the most convincing explanation I have read, thank you!
The point is to better match the current pronunciation bəl
, not change the pronunciation.
I am French, I know that. Let me expend the title to make it easier to understand.
In American English, words of French origin like “meter” (American English) inverted the last letters of “metre” (British English from French “mètre”) to better match the English pronunciation. Why isn’t it also the case for other similar situations like “possible”?
Are stupid non researched hypothesis allowed? I had in my mind: maybe those roles come from times when life was more violent, so having a strength advantage due to biology was an obvious way to hold power and impose rules that benefit your group/gender. I feel this somehow connects to emotional behaviors that may be required for war and politics, such as not showing your weaknesses. Then you have centuries of cultural development, such as religions, that created layers of justification for the social order that benefited the people in power, even when the physical strength advantage is not relevant anymore, and that’s what we consider tradition.
Reality is probably more complicated.
Is patriarchy and the emotional difference really specific to Western society, if we compare to Arabic, Indian or Chinese traditional cultures, for example?
Snowden was an IT expert, it certainly helps. His book is a great read.
In Japan, they won’t say much to your face, but they will say you’re impolite, useless and should get fired in the internet reviews, if you didn’t treat them like royalty from beginning to end.
I was really mad last time that happened.