Somewhere halfway last century

IIUC, it was around the time the artistic set (F. Scott & Zelda Fitzgerald, et al) started to be written about & photographed sunbathing, playing outdoor sports, & generally enjoying themselves around Antibes.

Suddenly the world wanted a piece of that luxury, or at least wanted to look like they’d had a piece of it.

In addition to being tanned, the bright young things of the French Riviera were fit and lean. So this, too, became fashionable. In previous centuries, fat was instead the sign of wealth.

Do you have a source showing that it is happening in the UK at a greater rate than former rental properties are being sold to people who will live in them?

Source?

1. They don’t. The landlords who are whingeing are just rentier capitalists who resent any regulation.

2. Very dependent on the landlord (usually bad) & the property (ditto) & the willingness (ditto) of the local council to intervene when needed. IME, it was shit.

You overlooked the most important outcome: landlords selling property to individuals who will live there.

This is a good thing because it reduces property prices, moves the market away from rentier capitalism towards people owning their own homes, and reduces economic inequality and insecurity.

Hopes these white coats show up at the White House real soon.

In the UK at least, decisions and rationale about which vaccinations and treatments should be publicly-funded via the NHS are published quite transparently. For example: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/story/preventing-cancer-extending-vaccination-boys

Vaccinating everyone in the UK against everything for which vaccines are available (even against diseases with very low risk in the UK) would cost so much that the NHS would have to cut treatments with very high benefit-to-cost ratio.

Therefore, below a certain benefit-to-cost threshold, the UK has no reasonable choice except to withhold public funding. The HPV vaccine for boys was right on that threshold. IMO, the UK did the right thing by funding the clear benefit (HPV vaccine for girls, whose risk was significantly higher per existing evidence) and extending it to boys when additional evidence showed it was worth doing so.

deleted by creator

Cost-benefit is the likely reason.

For comparison: the UK initially concluded the cost-benefit ratio was in favour of girls-only HPV vaccination, but IIUC updated this assessment and offered it to boys too after a public campaign by Jaime Winstone.

Thanks, I’ll try that.

The issue has happening on an increasing number of websites, though: Ecosia, ScienceDirect, TrainSplit (which thankfully has a fallback to hCaptcha), Indeed, and more.

Thanks. What’s your source for that list? I think you’re right that those measurements are factors in the final “bot score”, but I expect there are many other measurements also factored in.

If you look at my OP, though, you’ll see my browser passed the checks but was still blocked, which Cloudflare said shouldn’t happen.

It pops up on which page?

I can’t see it on either of the pages mentioned in my OP:

• https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-challenges/troubleshooting/challenge-solve-issues/
• https://browser-compat.turnstile.workers.dev/

I’m getting this issue in Chromium.

Like you, I’ve encountered it especially often in the last 3 weeks or so. Thanks for confirming it’s not just me!

Do you have a link to that feedback form, by any chance?

I eventually managed to find contact details for the webmaster for the site on which I most recently encountered this. Hopefully they’ll fix it in their Cloudflare configuration.

Failing that, I’ll try User-Agent spoofing. Failing that, another ISP, or VPN.

Cloudflare is already wrongly flagging this Linux box as a bot when it connects from an ordinary domestic ISP.

Surely it would be more likely to flag it if it was connecting from a VPN exit node.

No VPN present in this particular case.

“They”?

Maybe I’m having a brainfart, but what’s wrong with the headline?

This is by David Revoy, who has started getting wrongly accused of using AI for his art

Progress report 1

• I’m ruling out HMAC-SHA1, because:
  • Plain vanilla HMAC-SHA1 uses a shared secret. I don’t want the PC/server to have a copy of the credential. May also be susceptible to MITM/relay attacks.
  • Rolling-code HMAC-SHA1 only partially solves those problems.
  • Encrypted rolling code HMAC-SHA1 solves those problems, but I haven’t found a reliable source for using it with LUKS.
• If using systemd, pick FIDO2:
  • Avoids flaws of HMAC-SHA1.
  • Native support in systemd, so “future-proof”.
  • Wider support than OpenPGP. More HST vendors to choose from, including cheaper options than NitroKey or Yubikey: useful if each sysadmin (or colleague, or relative) needs an HST.
  • Compatible with QubesOS.
• Otherwise, OpenPGP:
  • Like FIDO2, solves HMAC-SHA1 flaws.
  • However:
    • smartcard-key-luks seems unmaintained on GitHub and on GitLab.
    • LUKS with OpenPGP isn’t well-documented for non-Debian-based distros.
• TBD: Clevis/Tang:
  • Remote/network-based unlocking.