Signal likely does not have

CIA financial backing

But this is the kind of information that can be only dispositive.

That is, because we cannot prove a negative, and the only time you can be certain about whether an organization—especially one like the CIA—has provided funding for something, is after it has been proven.

But where else could he find another spouse?

I wonder what the economics are that keeps the lot at the corner asphalt instead of a hotel or empty condos.

Listen, here Meth Is Guy

The waxy flame has to be pretty bad for your health

Just once it would be nice to see him on the receiving end

It’s wild that just 25 years ago, this would not likely be the reaction.

Hemlines go up and down

Preference for badonk goes up and down

A manly penis size and high-heel height are also super culturally defined

Left and right, right?

Gay guy here and I had trouble parsing the headline. I was relieved by the top comment. Phew.

This is exactly how Apple and almost all messaging apps work for almost all http: and https:. But there are no Apple-developed TOR-protocol products.

Apple has easy access to Google’s icon if I message a link to, say, https://google.com/; how can Apple emulate that behavior if I message a link to http://fully-functional-domain-with-identifiable-branding.onion/?

Even a Danish-sized danish would work

Are there still any phrases that Finnish people say that you can clearly understand?

No. But even if it is, how would the icon appear if I have never visited the .onion site?

on-device

You don’t mean like a pre-existing list of potential .onion sites that iOS users may one day visit, right?

https://m.photofunia.com/categories/all_effects/retro-wave

In this house,

𝑦 = −|𝑚𝑥| − |𝑏|.

Gracias, camarada.

It doesn’t seem like it. Prove it.

I’m a dweeb and a comrade, friend

Hi every:3

¿Cómo se comrade en español?