They’re not stupid; its not in docker. Check apt.
They’re not stupid; its not in docker. Check apt.
This technique is controversial because there is limited understanding of its complete effects on the marine ecosystem,[5] including side effects and possibly large deviations from expected behavior. Such effects potentially include release of nitrogen oxides,[6] and disruption of the ocean’s nutrient balance.[1] Controversy remains over the effectiveness of atmospheric CO2 sequestration and ecological effects.
Geoengineering is bullshit proposed by funding from fossil fuel companies so they can continue to pollute.
The solution is simple: make it illegal to pollute. Fine the companies responsible for their past contributions to the climate catastrophe out of existence.
This is the solution. You drain it and sequester the carbon.
Line the plater with steel, and this is not a problem. Bonus: trees are dwarfs and don’t present risks of falling on structures in storms.
Oh thats why the box below it provides heating and cooling. Its powered by a gasoline generator.
That will never happen. Cash is useful for laundering money, and governments are full of people working for criminals that need to launder money.
Solar panels are enough for power during the day.
Microgrids with solar panels on every residential home is key
This is bullshit. Everywhere I was in Scandinavia, you could buy with cash. If one shop didn’t take cash, you just went across the street to the other that did. Even in small towns north of the Artic Circle.
Even Scandinavia isn’t stupid enough to become 100% cashless
Fortunately this would never happen, for the reason you listed. Cash is king and always will be.
This happened in Ukraine when they were attacked with a cyberweapon (NotPetya) by Russia in 2017
If you want to know what happens when all of the computers (banks, bus pass scanners, grocery store cash registers, ATMs, etc) stop working, I highly recommend listening to this episode of Darknet Diaries
Containers have been around for decades. Look into lxc.
But for the best security, you want VMs. Look into proxmox.
Install the package with apt. Avoid docker completely.
If the docker image maintainer has a github, open a ticket asking them to publish a Debian package
Oof, TLS isnt a replacement for signatures. There’s a reason most package managers use release signatures. x.509 is broken.
And, yes PGP has a WoT to solve its PKI. That’s why we can trust apt sigs and not docker sigs.
PKI.
Apt and most release signing has a root of trust shipped with the OS and the PGP keys are cross signed on keyservers (web of trust).
DCT is just TOFU. They disable it because it gives a false sense of security. Docker is just not safe. Maybe on 10 years they’ll fix it, but honestly it seems like they just dont care. The well is poisoned. Avoid. Use apt or some package manager that actually cares about security
Package managers like apt use cryptography to check signatures in everything they download to make sure they aren’t malicious.
Docker doesn’t do this. They have a system called DCT but its horribly broken (not to mention off by default).
So when you run docker pull
, you can’t trust anything it downloads.
I think OP is a teenager working at a fast food joint or something. I doubt they have email or lead many complex projects
You know it doesn’t verify any signature on download, right?
Nope. See DCT. Its a joke.
Use apt.
Neither. Use wazuh. You’re welcome.