1G!

Jeez, dat internal to external genital ratio

Thank you Deb and Ian.

Debian on servers. Mint for my friends’ laptops.

Debian in Qubes for me.

If all your connections come from the same IP, and you’re the only one using that IP, then everyone knows all of your traffic is associated with you.

If the advisory is the State, then the ISP will still he able to see all your traffic.

You do visit them. Its a tea chat

The keyboard apps are backdoored.

Yeah. But it kinda defeats the purpose.

The whole point of a VPN is to mix your traffic with tons of other people’s traffic

Please dont do that. Use a link instead. Put the image in the body.

This is a link sharing platform.

RemindMe 10 years

You didn’t count the cost of size and environmental damage.

Because its a colony that’s not equal.

Only for a few weeks before a judge tells them to release you. And so they send you to a black site in another country with no trial.

Borders are patrolled by CBP (customs and border protection). Part of CBPs job is to charge you tarrifs on the stuff you’re bringing into the country.

Sometimes I’ve had to pay import tarrifs many times when crossing back and forth (for the same thing over-and-over). Its best not to cross the border with expensive stuff.

So basically gmail’s motto: “search. dont sort”

Welcome to Lemmy. We have a link field. Use it.

Using apt, yum, dnf, pacman etc beats flatpak by magnitudes

Flatpaks can be verified. Compare that to apt packaged, which must be cryptographically signed.

That’s why flatpak isnt secure. If you use it, you might end up running malicious code. Because, unlike most Linux repo package managers, it doesn’t require packages to be cryptographically verified as authentic.

Shame they didn’t mention that homebrew is a security nightmare and will happily download maliciously modified code

Edit: omg then the author claims flatpak is better for security?!? It has the same nightmare security issues.

They’re on the clearnet. Their identities are already known…