Oh okay so it’s not useless then

Damn, didn’t know that was a thing, I’ll check if that’s also the case for me

Btw !7daystodie@lemmy.world

It should be negligible anyways

There isn’t https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/1902-2D54-E445-59DD

Maximum friend list size seems to be capped at 2000 though

That’s a better explanation, but Steam still allows for much bigger friends list if you craft badges, so pay, but not for specifically paying games

Apart from Steam, which platform does that?

Many people don’t know that’s a thing in Steam btw

You also need to test genuine images to check the real accuracy

In some games, they’re public by default then you should make them private. I’m thinking of Dying Light for example

Why are friend list size limits a thing? Except for UI, it shouldn’t be a problem. And a simple search feature fixes the problem

The comments are insane

Are they really accurate?

I still fail to see how anarchism inherently wants to make salaries and income more even

That’s an extension that belongs to a branch of anarchism, it is not supposed to be like this by definition

The wikipedia definition doesn’t seem to agree with what you’re saying.

It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.

When you ban people disagreeing with you, you’re not making anyone feel safer, you’re just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard

When you ban people by stating they’re transphobic when they’re not, you’re being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you’re with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.

When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.

But maybe it’s just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation

Income inequalities don’t implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people

Anarchism mainly rejects the state’s hierarchy. It doesn’t make it left or right

Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules

both are often linked

Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me

blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn’t mean they’re not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.

!196@lemmy.world doesn’t exist for no reason

Ehm… no?

for db0 it might be as frankly I don’t know, it was just a feeling that I have, that they’re more open towards liberalism

But for blahaj, up left seems like the correct spot

Woke, pro freedom of gender/identity, progressive; so most of the time left

Authoritarian, huge voice, strict on voicing their opinions and rules on the subject. You either agree or you’re banned. So authoritarian

I don’t know this one, worth checking out?