I’ve tried nothing and I’m all out of ideas.

You might consider using something like Cloudflared or Tailscale’s Funnels to proxy the connections through to prevent DDOSing and apply ACLs. You can still use your domains with those.

I mean, it sucks, but the stupid shit people will do with company laptops…

Nobara is a great option if you don’t want to deal with the weirdness of installing stuff on an immutable distro. Nobara also has a bunch of tweaks for video editing software like OBS and Blender.

Domain authentication and group policy analogs. Honestly, I think it’s the major reason it isn’t used as a workstation OS when it’s inherently more suited for it than Windows in most office/gov environments. But if IT can’t centrally managed it like you can with Windows, it’s not going to gain traction.

Linux in server farms is a different beast to IT. They don’t have to deal with users on that side, just admins.

Been using this for years, runs like a top.

Easydns.ca

House next to nazi bar.

I haven’t lasted long enough after the Search piss-off to notice the tomfoolery of that. Well, you probably shouldn’t be creating new folders from there, don’t you understand how the workflow-as-handed-down-by-Jehosaphat is supposed to be used?

Honestly, that defaulting to the Search field in the Save dialog when I’m trying to save something just gets me wild. It beggars the imagination why the developers think that’s a reasonable thing to do and it colors my whole perception of the DE.

Plasma for the last decade. Then probably XFCE, then Cinnamon.

I try Gnome every year or so, but every time I get pissed off with it within a few minutes and wipe it off my machine.

OK, yah, that’s good point about swarms. I’ve generally not used any swarmed filesystem stuff where I needed persistence, just shared databases, so it hasn’t come up.

Well, I know you can define volumes for other filesystem drivers, but with bind mounts, you don’t need to define the bind mount as you do, you can just specify the path directly in the container volumes and it will bind mount it. I was just wondering if there was any actual benefit to defining the volume manually over the simple way.

Is there any advantage to bind mounting that way? I’ve only ever done it by specifying the path directly in the container, usually ./data:data or some such. Never had a problem with it.

S O C I A L M E D I A M A N I P U L A T I O N.

Absolutely. Even if your ISP is firewalling, never trust they will maintain it, and some of these cheapshit routers they use are awful. Use your own router and put it on the ISP routers DMZ.

Then you’d have to share them back from the host to the guest using NFS or samba, and there’s no reason to have them on the host. No, you’re fine. That’s what I would consider the right way to do it for what you describe as your purpose. Putting more layers in there isn’t serving a useful purpose, which is why I say to not bother with a NAS to store them, if your primary use of them is via the Arr stack VM.

They seem to go in spurts on the cryptobullshit. Sometimes you go for months without hearing anything about it, then it’s part of the next 5 LUP shows. I can certainly do without it, and I think he gets emails shitting on him for it and he tones down for a while.

I did walk away from all his shows for a couple years there because he was on and on about how anyone that’s still mad at Microsoft is stupid, and I couldn’t take it. It was like he was on the payroll there for a while.

It’s unfortunate, I’d have an issue too, I have Canadian farmer levels of swearing I don’t even notice myself doing it. And some of the sayings are probably racist as hell but it’s not meant that way, it’s just carryover from the old days.

In the end I think it worked out well for him, but some understanding that not every culture is as uptight and puritanical as America would have been in order.

Ah, I did not know that, but that’s one of the shows I don’t listen to. I listen to the Changelog shows for much of my dev stuff.