A guy on the internet who does things sometimes

  • 0 Posts
  • 495 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle


  • I totally had a guy catch and call me on that

    “Those 3 months I did consulting for a local elderly care facility, helping them learn some computer basics”

    “Sir, your parents don’t count” without missing a beat. I actually did help other people in that specific chunk he was asking about, but rude lol, and I think that might even be a big part of why I didn’t get that one tbh







  • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldLiquid Trees
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Maybe this invention can be used on places where trees cannot lives, but I’d still take a city with trees over a city full of green tanks.

    These in the spots where trees once stood but were too destructive & trees everywhere else imo. Cool tech future AND trees, plus these are benches too it looks like



  • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldLiquid Trees
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure

    I think you mean all, as this reads more like “nuh uh, trees don’t ruin anything”

    But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.

    And those are not the norm, so for places that don’t plan to just destroy what’s already there and start anew, this is an option




  • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldLiquid Trees
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because there’s no serious answers being given even though there are at least 2:

    • trees have roots, roots ruin any nearby human infrastructure. You’ll note this says “in urban environments” and that there are trees nearby, so this is probably the big reason
    • trees need maintenance, which costs money. this is a stupid reason imo, but it’s one nonetheless
    • algae is cool, ok?






  • Took me a minute of googling to be vaguely sure you meant what I think you mean: the comma marking the end of your dependant interjectory clause there?

    at least in America**,**

    If so: I have no idea what you are talking about, that’s drilled into us in school. Maybe people get lazy on the Internet but it is part of the rules and gets taught and used here

    If I’ve misunderstood: what are you talking about, then?