Yeah.

There’s waaay worse things you can catch.

I dislike it.

Pretty sure my instance blocks it.

I believe it’s counter productive and stifles engagement.

If only there were some way you could kind of refer viewers to the primary documentation for the project.

It’s not that it’s uncommon, but slightly different for each project.

I collated library would be kinda cool.

That said, I don’t know how much utility this project would have.

Settle down pet. Of course I know what I meant but I’m concerned that you do not.

That’s not really what I’m saying… at all.

Everyone encounters unsolvable problems, whether or not they favor thought terminating cliches. However, we also encounter problems which only appear to be unsolvable. My point is, if you take the attitude that “it is what it is”, you’ll never know the difference.

You can call me captain solveitall if you wish, but I suspect that won’t make you any less miserable.

I can’t believe I have to say this but “I’m not going to attempt to resolve this” is not the same as “I have not made any attempt to resolve this”.

Honestly though, you’re very welcome to continue spouting dumb phrases like “it is what it is” if you find that helpful.

I didn’t say there was no attempt.

Saying you have nothing else to say or do is “thought terminating” you’re stifling discussion rather than encouraging investigation of potential solutions.

The problem with thought terminating cliches like “it is what is is”, is that it promotes lazy thinking.

You may as well say "I’ve encountered another problem which I’m not going to attempt to resolve. "

Indeed. “Hunting is more sustainable than farming” is an idiotic assertion.

Click the column header to select the column, then click and drag the selected cells to wherever you want.

Note that dragging cells in this way is the same as copy & paste, so it will not insert the column at your destination and move the existing columns along, it will leave a gap where you dragged it from and overwrite the column wherever you leave it.

My explanation is better:

There’s three doors, of which one is the winner.

First, pick a door to exclude. You have a 66% chance of correctly excluding a non-winning door.

Next, Monty excludes a non- winning door with certainty.

Finally, open the remaining door and take the prize!

This is a common argument in our house.

Hah! Me too, exactly this.

You’re very willing to surmise what their views on Biden would be, but not Trump?

I’m not asking you to speak for them.

Do you think they would feel relieved that Trump is POTUS?

Do you think Palestinians are relieved that Trump is POTUS now?

Sorry for your loss.

Religion sucks so much, especially the more dogmatic ones. Mormonism is gross.

One insight I would offer is that categorising people as “good” or “not good” may not be helpful. I suspect that your dad probably invests a lot of effort in being a good man, he’s just unable to acknowledge that his perspective has been corrupted.

We judge ourselves by our intentions but others by their actions.

It’s not wrong to never speak to him again, but maybe this will make the mourning easier.

Me neither. We do dozens in Australia.

I mean, what if someone needs a quarter of a carton? Or even a third? Didn’t think about that did they.

Curse these Europeans with their fancy metric numbers.

Lemmy seems so snarky lately.