I was educated not to leave trash around when I visited nature.

I guess it’s not.

Same as yaoi or yuri, it doesn’t need to be sexual. I’m not actually expert on the matter.

I remember watching this famous anime “made in abyss” the drawing style is clearly loli, and there are some heavy loli tones on it. But as far as I’ve seen there’s no sexual content in it, (though I’ve read that the author is indeed shady about sexual content involving minors).

That gives another differentiate factor. There are people that might like lolicon just for the cuteness like hello kitty or something like that. I didn’t actually thought about that.

Precog bouncer. Asigned to the daemon of future cybercrimes. Obviously.

I’m using it. It’s good. Even without the cloud services the bouncer and scenarios are more powerful than fail2ban.

Shame about no self hosted web ui but someone posted here a project I’m ought to look up oncw I arrive home.

Put it on a bottle, and when the bottle is full take it to the used oil recycling bin in my neighborhood.

This thread is a firestorm but I’m going in, wish me luck.

I think is a connotations game here. Lolicon have less bad connotations than paedophile.

The world paedophile makes you think of a criminal, someone who have content that was made hurting children. Someone who probably has hurt children themselves. Despite the more profound consideration that a paedophile might or might not act on their impulses, the connotation on the word is that.

Then there is the word lolicon. That word have a different connotation. Here you think about some anime geek with terabytes of drawn naked kids. But you don’t tend to associate their behavior with real kids. Regardless on the possibility that lolicons do hurt children or also have material that hurt children. The connotation of the word is that their obsession only focus on the drawn naked children.

Most people in general consider drawn pictures of children less harmful or even not harmful at all compared to actually abusing kids. So one word really doesn’t have the same weight as another.

Then, we have the question. Using a word with more/less weight is justified here or not?

We all now some paedophiles have rebranded themselves as MAPS, precisely trying to shake of the bad connotations of paedophile.

Is this the same case? Is using lolicon trying to evade the “paedophile tag” or is it something actually different?

I get the disgusting feeling about lolicon. But personally I do think is essentially different to what we normally think about a paedophile. If someone told me “X is a paedophile” I would as “so are they in jail?”. But if someone tells me that “X is q lolicon” I won’t assume that they have done something deserving jail time, I’ll probably be wondering if they are also a paedophile, but the fact that I think of it as an “addition” means to me that those are not the same.

On another differentiate fact. I think it’s not uncommon for people to accidentally see lolicon, it has happened to me. Looking for some yaoi you might end up opening a lolicon manga, or maybe you watch an anime and it has some lolicon tones. The normal reaction is not liking it and move on, but it’s not a traumatic experience. I have luckily never watch CP but if somehow it was accidentally showed to me I think it would be a traumatic experience that probably would scar me for life.

So, on the bases that I think different things when I think about each of those words I do not think that’s an accurate translation.

Then there is the question to people who do think those two terms are the same. Do you truly think those two terms refer to the same thing or you just feel so disgusted by lolicon that you want the term lolicon to be viewed with as much disgust as people see paedophile?

Every time you don’t want to have a kid for whatever reason is ethical to abort.

What’s not ethical is to have a child you don’t really want.

I live in a opt-out system. That means we are all donors unless we explicitly said the contrary.

I have never heard of a murder for an organ match.

Also I think we are the top one or two in the world on organ transplants.

This is going to translate into “more sells” same as drm.

People who want to pay will pay. People who doesn’t want to pay won’t ever pay. With digital media there’s objectively any loss if someone who didn’t pay played your game. So just let it be, you are not going to sell more just because you removed or made smaller the steam refund window.

The thing that worries me about wikipedia is that they are increasing the expenses as the donations go up. So if someday donations stop they will not have as much saved as they should.

Also most of the massive increase in expenses that Wikipedia has each years seems unjustified.

AFAIK the flakpak doesn’t bundle the linux kernel. And sometimes the kernel itself is the problem. Specially with programs that run very close to metal.

Let my write on LinkedIn that circumcized people cannot play gta VI and enjoy the AIshitshow.

Jesus was 50% terrorist, 50% delusional.

Jesus was Jewish as we all know. But he was not the main Jewish faith. He was part of the Baptist cult. As his friend/family John the Baptist. When John gets executed, Jesus radicalized.

It’s a story old as time, someone in a movement gets killed and the movement becomes far more radical. That happened with the Baptist cult which were opposed to the mainstream Jewish faith of the moment. Jesus took the leadership role with his friends, and was probably delusional about the whole thing.

I’ve known people who has done drugs just because “party fun” and ended up hooked.

There are plenty of people out there. Some would have take on drugs because their lives where miserable, or even as a form of anesthesic, but other just because they were fun (at the beginning)

One of the most used drugs, tobacco, people start smoking “just because it’s cool”, and end up hooked for life. Never underestimate how addictive are drugs and how social pressure or just social behavior could make someone try a substance.

Also it’s again the false sense of security pf “if you don’t use vibed apps you’ll be fine”, making people forget basic security procedures.

I, for instance, had a service vulnerable and discontinued without noticing for months. It was something 100% made before LLM was a thing. Still had unpatched vulnerabilities and the project was abandoned. It was my fault for not checking more often is the services I host are safe or not.

If someone doesn’t want to pay for your game they would just pirate it.

I get that’s a disappointment for the publisher seeing a sale and then seeing that sale dissapear. But AFAIK they do not have to do anything, Steam manages the refund for them, so it’s harmless.

No matter how well you try to adjust the window, I could just copy the game files in my computer, apply the crack if needed and be done with it. I could ask for a refund after just one minute if I wanted. So my advice would be, don’t worry about it. You will be paid, as always, by people who appreciate your work and want to give money to you, and, as always, some people will play your game for free.

I’m not sure about that. Each time there’s conflict between Romani gangs and Muslim gangs the fascists always cheer for the Romani.

The fascist party of my country actually has some good support among the Romani communities.

Linux has a fundamental problem with native builds of closed source applications.

This is lack of true retro compatibility.

On windows you can still run software made for windows XP with more or less issues. But windows api are more stable and it does have retro compatibility tools built in.

Linux does not, once in a while the OS APIs change, and any software not patched for those changes might stop working completely.

I have been thinking for a while. That it would be great if some sort of “linux retro compatibility” tool existed.

Similar to launching a program in windows with “window 7 compatibility” to be able to launch linux apps woth “Kernel 4 compatibility” or something like that.

Could you provide some examples when that had happened?

I’m looking up famous projects using mit license and in any of those that had happened.

Lua, node.js, jQuery…

Even X11 which was indeed replaced by other system… Wayland, which also uses MIT license.

The logic was that with a mit license companies will provide a copy of the software infected with spyware leaving the open source project behind.

Explain why that hasn’t happened to godot.