It may be possible…

It may not be necessary…

What, no avocado toast?

So… it’s an order, then?

Bill Nyehilism is for me.

I’m painting a cave wall right now.

It’s George Lucas and Steven Spielberg violating Indiana Jones.

Yeah, I worked in a few affordable housing sites and the OP looks like something the on-site social workers cooked up.

You have to use your imagination

A&W

A Nintendo64 with several game cartridges. It’s a little flaky, but it still works for the most part.

Pfft. Real programmers use butterflies

You shouldn’t help old ladies cross the street anyway

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JESczegwk0g

The trick is to bounce both legs but in opposite directions. When one is going up the other is going down, cancelling each other out.

It could certainly be used as evidence in your favor. Whether it by itself would be enough to exonerate you would depend on things like the evidence against you and how much weight the jury gave to your records.

These are known as souvenir plots. Generally, you aren’t buying the land, but rather you’re buying a contractual right to prevent the actual owner from developing the land.

Californian. No.

It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.

Jobs being made obsolete by new technology is one thing.

Artists having their works taken and profited off of without consent, attribution, or compensation is another.

How did you post a empty comment?