Welp that’s enough internet for today.
- 1 Post
- 141 Comments
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Why do you never talk about what you're reading? Me:
2·6 hours agoThe title is funny, it’s a bit like saying ancient Egyptian semiconductors.
Like having a fridge room of a curated beer selection to walk into and pick from. I don’t really think about individual beers more so than breweries. There’s like 200 breweries in town and I would like to have a selection of kegs or tall boys from at least two dozen of them.
If I was absurdly wealthy then beyond helping people. I would have this in my house.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·14 hours agoDang I was really hoping you were going to respond ‘Ay’ to be punny. Anyways, no one here disappears (I mean unless they died) they are still there existing and influencing the world all the same like you. The only thing that disappeared was your ability to communicate to them via the app when you closed it.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
3·1 day agoHonestly I ended up there by accident because I only browse all and new and it was my bad for not checking the sub rules first. Likewise, I feel like we’ve gotten some resolution between you and I and I wish you the best (◍•ᴗ•◍).
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoWhat happens when em gets reversed for ya?
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
2·1 day agoHonestly I wasn’t thinking that deep about it. Was far more casual of a statement than this makes it out to seem. My main intention was to apologize which is what I wrote first. It’s not like I wrote an opus on the injustices of a particular community or anything. It was like a five word quip. So I apologize again it came off like that to you.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoWell it’s more so a general concern but for that particular instance there was someone else in breach of the same rule I was. I messaged to apologize and just say hey, hope y’all got that other guy too kinda. Didn’t seem harmful to me but if you took offense then I apologize for that as well.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoThere’s not really anything to do. If I was a member of the sub I would suggest changing that and likely leave if that wasn’t going to happen. Since I’m not a member there’s really not much of anything to do beyond answering questions like the one you gave me.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoYeah but that aside I think most people enjoy or prefer fairness. Like what’s the point of rules if they aren’t fair, then they’re more like suggestions than rules.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoI was just offering. I’m all about rule following everywhere, not just in a particular community and breaking the rules should definitely be downvoted. Once again I’m apologizing for the human error on that comment.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoI can send you my login credentials if you want.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoYeah like the example you gave is a good example of someone being off topic. It’s just that I don’t see that circumstance very often personally. More so i have personally seen it used in a disagreement type way, like a single sentence will be taken out of a comment and used to say the whole comment is off topic when I personally didn’t feel they were as egregiously off topic like in the example you gave. So in that sense it seems subjective… that person felt the other was off topic, I as a third party subjectivity didn’t agree
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
2·1 day agoI mean I’m mostly sorry for breaking the rules which is why I apologized, I goofed, human error gets us all from time to time. That circumstance totally makes sense and I’ve agreed time and time again that rule breaking deserves downvotes in this thread alone. Honestly I was thinking about other experiences I’ve had, particularly with some very verbally rude individuals.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoMore so to apologize but yeah rules should be applied equally since there was another guy in those same threads although i don’t agree with the point they were making.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoI don’t think so, but to each their own.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
2·1 day agoI goofed with the comment, I apologized to who I could. I would have added an apology but I can’t. So either way, sorry again.
Zephyr@sh.itjust.worksOPto
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is anyone else apprehensive to down voting even if you're being down voted?
1·1 day agoMad?. Not at all. I actually apologized to who I could. I would have added an apology on the thread but I can’t.

I’ll give you a real world analogy. Have you ever tried to balance rocks? You can get two or three rocks balanced but that could put one of the lower balance points out of balance. It’s like that. That is the assumption that code has a singular dependence and it’s all linear is incorrect in most circumstances. Code often has many dependencies and many other parts depending on it.