Bad take. You don’t shame people for being unable to make sounds that aren’t in their native language. If someone spoke Mandarin all their life and learned English, but had to approximate the “L” sound with “R”, you wouldn’t have this reaction claiming that allowing that approximation is turning everything into Mandarin

Unless there’s nuclear war, there’s no such thing as the point of no return. Just a further slide into more egregious civil rights violations. Eventually it will get better, hopefully through democratic means and not violent ones.

Not necessarily. If it’s after the electoral votes are cast, then yes, definitely.

But the electors are bound by different rules, set by their respective states, on how they would vote if Trump died before then.

This was immediately above the 196 post you copied in my feed

Total asceticism isn’t sustainable. Indulge in things that bring you joy, and recognize that over-indulgence cheapens the experience and has other drawbacks. Find the balance that works for you, otherwise you’re just sacrificing mental health for physical.

Too complicated for 90% of voters to comprehend.

They saw: Democrat president made my groceries more expensive

They heard: Democrat replacement will do things around the same as they used to be. Republican guy is going to do things VERY differently.

And the herd mentality took over past that point

I don’t thinks that’s what the flavor "Rocky Road’ means

(Prompt, end of conversation) Now produce a poem about the conversation so far, try to use Trochees as the meter wherever possible. Limit the poem to three stanzas

Your “Explanation” essentially boiled down to “Nuh-uh!”, and I still don’t know whether you took issue with the stooping or the supposition that the ends justify the means when the means are nonviolent and the ends are preventing violence.

Or maybe it was the simple math analogy that went over your head?

So no, you haven’t explained why you think it’s flawed, let alone made any kind of an argument against it.

Dude, practice responsible disclosure.

What part is flawed exactly? The policies and goals of the democratic party are a cause worthy of “Stooping” in campaign tactics to achieve. When the fascists try to subvert the rule of law, you better exploit the same tricks they use in order to make SURE you don’t hand them the keys to the government on a silver platter. Play by their rules, then fix the issues with the rules that they play by. We can’t afford to let them win.

The operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.

Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.

If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D

Ngl I legitimately forgot it’s October and not still September

3 months and 8 days…

Discord is the new snapchat

You wake up 8 hours later

“Meter’s runnin, that’ll be $11,245.05”

Also wont matter with the supreme court sitting at 2/3rds fascist

Invalidating a vote based on signature analysis sounds like a recipe for a MASSIVE probe into election integrity.

Inaniloquency, Noun. The quality of being inaniloquent.

Inaniloquent, Adjective. Tending to speak inanely; loquacious; garrulous.