The biggest flaw is that it assumes you’ll add conditions you’re not explicitly told are allowed. Many, many problems in school would be trivial if changing the terms beyond what’s stated was allowed.

What’s wrong with being selfish? I didn’t want kids, full-time kids are annoying and a huge responsibility. If someone doesn’t desire children, it’s very much ok to dedicate the energy and resources of raising several kids to themselves.

People are selfish, reproducing doesn’t exempt you from being selfish, people can have kids for selfish reasons too.

I admit sometimes I’ve thought it would have been cool to raise a human from zero, trying to make them a good person, and be a demigod to them on their first years because they didn’t know better; but I still think the world needs less people, not more. Since the 70s we were warned about overpopulation and the environment, and we just added another 4 billion people anyway.

Edit: thank you for the correction, kind stranger.

I always wanted to grow a beard, and the confinement was the ideal situation to see if it suited me. Never shaved since then, and I think I never will. Beards are great.

Whatever your place defines as a standard. I’ve seen ugly code in C, JavaScript, Java, etc., that uses them all over the place because they’re not mandatory.

If you don’t have consistent indenting, your code looks like copy/paste from several sources; but if you do have consistent indenting, then the indenting of Python is a non-issue.

This whole genre of comics is so cringe, they’re basically moral outrage click bait with cartoons.

They have this in common:

• Low-effort drawing (at least this one is not that bad)
• Forced scenarios to put characters at the polar opposite of the moral spectrum.
• Trying so hard to generate indignation.

I don’t mean that the problem isn’t real, but this is a circlejerk with too many cartoonists already. In a few years we’ll be embarrassed of having participated in this trend of imaginary situations while doing nothing IRL.

It would have to be someone who knows him, or something about his style, accessories, or behavior, that emboldened a stranger to assume he was gay. The comic gives no hint at any of this being evident.

Or maybe that guy calls everyone a faggot because he’s always confrontational.

You seem

I SAID NO LOOKS!

Basically, pro athletes cost the team dearly, but you didn’t cost your coach a cent.

Then poor Timmy finds out someone spray painted his beloved cybertruck, what a world.

• But Diddlydee, I need to pay my mortgage tomorrow!
• You can go in person. stands and looks across the street The bank there seems to be still in the same place.

So just leave or go to therapy? Since the comic is very ambiguous, it could signify three things:

• Her boyfriend is being toxic to her.
• She is being toxic to her boyfriend.
• Both are being toxic to each other.

In any case, seek help if your relationship matters, or leave it because it’s toxic, wether intentionally or not.

We should strive to be well-adapted adults, this kind of behavior is immature and unhealthy, even if the toxicity comes from trauma and not malice.

That was a clear case for a switch statement, what an amateur.

TAKING NOTE ABOUT THIS PERSUASIVE
IMAGE GENERATION STRATEGY.
MY GRATITUDE, FELLOW HUMAN.```

I seriously doubt your quality is maintained when an LLM writes most of your code, unless a human audits every line and understands what and why it is doing it.

If you break the tasks small enough that you can do this each step, it is no longer writing a full application, it’s writing small snippets, and you’re code-pairing with it.

Software engineering is a mindset, a way of doing something while thinking forward (and I don’t mean just scalability), at least if you want it done with quality. Today you can’t vibe code but proofs of concept, prototypes that are in no way ready for production.

I don’t see current LLMs overcoming this soon. It appears that they’ve reached their limits without achieving general AI, which is what truly would obsolete programmers, and humans in general.

Not possible, neighbor implemented Negative Trust.

Tell me you’re from USA without telling me you’re from USA.

I kid, people have died from road rage in every country, just their car is dangerous enough.

Real programmers will write in a way that user’s resources are not being wasted because you need a full browser, a JS runtime, and DOM juggling, to show even the simplest application.

It’s not rare for simple JS applications to consume over half a gigabyte of RAM on startup, and way more CPU than their native counterparts. That this was normalized and even defended is stupid.

May be both, but universally, actions speak louder than words.

Ah, I see it now. I’d agree that the post should be removed, because it’s mostly noise, it isn’t even an attack.

Maybe the description could have been clearer, to help clueless people like me who aren’t used to all the different UIs Lemmy can be accessed from.