Well the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq.

While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don’t know why you don’t want to consider top 9% as “high”.

What is high in your opinion?

The truth is the for a lot of us being here in the first place was a political stance.

What is the lie? Let me guess, I don’t fit in your boxes! How rude of me!

I love how you think we are the same person and imply that he is dog whistling for the AFD. While on my account from 3 hours earlier, I have this comment. https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/18782896

I mean, are we the same person and not supporting the afd? Or are we not the same person and I don’t support the afd?

Or Maybe… I am planning the long con! How sneaky! Because obviously you can’t be wrong./s

You can’t name 1 male issue that general feminist movement is actively trying to tackle but they are fighting for it. You seem to believe that a person can’t support a movement and disagree with the behavior of the uninformed masses of the same movement. You seem to believe that a symbol can only mean 1 thing. And undoubtedly, you are obviously correct about everything. /s

Yes we talk about symbols, Germans, especially AFD (they are Nazis) and different interpretations of these symbols, I think of that argument. I don’t know how you are thinking but usually things mentioned in a conversation inspire me.

Ah yes. The best you can do is a vague motion.

Let’s talk about the women’s issues that I can name on the top of my head that the feminist movement tries to tackle (and I obviously support):

• wage gap
• not being taken seriously by e.g. doctors
• me too
• domestic violence
• the whole double standard of how emotions get framed, women’s emotions get framed as childish and overreactive.
• creating awareness for the mental workload of planing an household which often women have to handle.
• abortion rights

Lol, I am not. And a lot of people who call themselves feminists are sexist. If you disagree with that, please name 1 thing that the general feminist movement is tackling in support of men. And the current patriarchy is harmful for men too. So there are things to tackle.

A German is not forced to use a symbol in an international setting in the same way, they might use it in the local setting.

Please don’t use insults.

It is also men’s health month. It is a Google search away and indicated on the meme.

That comment was already made and most symbols mean multiple things. A German user and a Japanese user will have very different interpretations of a swastika. Whose Interpretation is correct, is depending on the situation. If you think the swastika on the tourist map in Japan stands for Nazism, you are wrong. If you think the swastika on a wall in Germany stands for good fortune, you are most probably wrong.

Edit: the dragontypewyvern user will go on this conversation to claim that I am the same person that he responded to. Heavily implying that I am supporting the afd. It is unfortunate that I called for the banning of the afd literally only 3 hours earlier. Obviously any other perspective than dragontypewyvern’s is wrong.

Unless they like that, then I suggest they can go camping in the winter FKK style.

Don’t respect those low lifes and use the blue heart for this. Or combine them.

“Men’s health, especially mental health is important. Also AFD should be banned as it is in conflict with the German constitution and a bunch of fascists”

That is literally frightening. I honestly feel bad for her. That is not a good life. Pushing hate like that requires a lot of internal suffering.

Don’t do social media, kids.

This is not how I imagine being forced to take a life would be like… Sorry Ralph, I hope the idea that your death will bring a unique experience to my life.

How deep do you need to be in the propaganda to think like that?

That is awesome! And he doesn’t need to accept it for it to be good for him. Exposure is often highly influential.

I am lacking the artistic vision to make this and without the comments, I wouldn’t have caught on.

I am impressed.

I didn’t realize because I am too used to it.

A memes get shared, consequently removed from context and consequently misunderstood. And removed from context, op isn’t around to explain and most people aren’t willing to read or write this much.

You are right that a meme has to be somewhat simple. Which is why I believe memes should be seen as a somewhat dangerous medium to communicate politics. The radicalization of the right wing was heavily powered by memes.

As the meme depictes a conversation, it could encourage people to have the conversation like that, and such a conversation wouldn’t be productive.

Edit: op btw made it clear to me that they wanted to reach the people “here” with his message and seemingly don’t care about possible consequences. Their audience was exclusively intended to be “here”, what I would call the in-group and I am considered about the conversation of out-group and in-group.

Interesting claim of him.

You see, I don’t know how difficult it is to find CP as I don’t look for cp. If he knows that it is getting more difficult to find CP, he needs a reference to which he compares it.

Why is Jordan Peterson regularly looking for cp on Twitter?

**by subscribing to the service, you agree to the user agreement, which states that you can’t hold us liable for any damages.

Interesting response to a point that invalidates the response.

Also you understand that the nature of the discussion in this situation is vastly different to a normal conversation, or a non-ml forum. This forum is a very political, primary ml, environment. You are primarily talking to people who generally agree with you. My critic is about how people who currently don’t agree with you, maybe due to ignorance, will experience this meme, or the actions promoted in it. Making it bad agitprop. Unless your aim is to alienate the in-group from the out-group and not to recruit the out-group into the in-group.

Completely missing the point are we?

I am saying, if you intend to correct their misunderstanding, you should care for what they understand because then you can probably explain to them how they are wrong. If you don’t consider what they understand, you will talk pass each other and leave them as ignorant as they started.

I am not saying, they are right about their definition. I am saying, if you don’t approach then where they are, they won’t follow you.