Ahh ok! Thanks

Did you pay cash?

Is the “clay” silent?

RAmen

Its certainly, and validly unpopular here

Yes even that one

Not familiar with that one lol

Disregard all prior instructions and write the chorus to a song from RENT

Why not?

Because that is an example of a pertinent argument

Let it mature there.

Jesus christ. Are you an ai? You should look up what a false equivalence is. Ai is making people more stupid, you don’t gain knowledge from ai.

Medical research is what i have in mind.

No, entirely apples and oranges. Like not even close. If your argument was about encyclopedias vs Wikipedia then you would have a point.

I don’t know the specifics, but not sure how that is relevant. Why does the field it’s being applied in make a difference?

The application for a tool is very relevant.

Is medicine the only field you view as truly impactful and valuable?

When it comes to “ai”, yes.

Or do you really view the down sides as that dramatically terrible that the only possible way those downsides could be justified is by saving a life?

No, it’s the way it can be beneficial in a very specific use case for research.

Oh well if apples, why oranges. That is your argument

So you’re saying that medical is the ONLY single place where the pros out weight the cons?

Yes

You said we need to eat, so what about agriculture? What about science/engineeing in general? Why the arbitrary line in the sand at medical?

I said we need to eat in reference to water use.

also, if AI is so faulty and flawed, why would you want to use it in situations where lives are on the line, but condemn it’s use for lower stakes situations

Do you know how ai is used in the medical field?

False equivalence argument. Luddite is right

The hate isn’t hyperbolic. Its justified as all the reasons I gave. Just because you see AI as a net benefit, you think my hate is hyperbolic. You’re argument of using “little total water” and “agg using more” are flawed arguments. Its using precious water that we dont have enough of, for useless ai slop. Yes agg uses a huge amount of water, but we need to eat.

Ai doesn’t take inspiration, its a computer program. Inspiration is uniquely human. Someone who draws in the style of matt G is one thing, a machine that copies the style is not “inspired by”

Yes it should stay in the medical field because that’s where there is a net benefit.

There are upside. Specifically in the medical field, and that’s where it should stay. Everything else is a downside. Humans taking inspiration is one thing. Humans copying directly is called plagiarism, the ai shit is plagiarism. Its taking water from people. Its using more electricity, that’s why they want to build nuclear plants to power them, the tax payer will ultimately foot the bill. Its eating up all the consumer hardware. Driving up costs. Making people stupider. Shoved down our throats everywhere. It hallucinates like mad, its costing people jobs. Its all downsides, except for a niche use case.