Not for everything no. I’ve seen some good for sure, but imo not enough.

I don’t recall attributing all the countries problems on Russia and the gop. Most of the dems are gop lite. There are some that do work towards housing and feeding. Like school lunch and breakfast programs.

and Russia has nothing to do with that.

Except the gop is in russias pocket

Russia is affecting those things in the us though. Maybe if the gop weren’t in russias pocket you’d be more on point.

Admitted what? That i will vote because I live in a somewhat democratic country? Yes, that doesn’t change the fact that trump is a fascist and any elections in the US will be sham elections.

So you are refuting what you said earlier. Good job!

Lol no, never refuted what I said earlier, nice try, try again.

Again no proof. So are you just gonna refrain from voting next election then? Since you think it won’t count. First you said you wouldn’t be able. NOW you’re saying it just won’t count. So what are you gonna do about it?

Again you don’t understand that that fascist, rapist, conman felon doesn’t care about laws or the constitution, and your inability to comprehend “not voting” is the same as sham elections like russia or north Korea, is quite telling.

I will vote, because as of yet I don’t live in a fascist dictatorship. I will defend my country from the fascist is what I will do.

Again, you have no proof that we won’t be able to vote next election. Because there is no proof that says that.

Again, you don’t understand that the felon doesnt care about laws or the constitution. I’m sure you can vote next election, just like they do in russia and north Korea.

There is no law or constitutional amendment that says we won’t be able to vote in next election. And you have no proof that we won’t be able to vote in next election.

As if the felon cared about laws or the constitution, what you need to tell yourself to cope brah.

As to your point, it’s just what was said it doesn’t matter because there are no laws. Show me the laws or the constitutional amendment.

I’m just matching your energy brah.

I understand what you’re saying the point to me that sticks out was the usage of “hypothetical”, which to me would mean things that don’t exist, which wouldn’t be a strawman as i understand it. With that being said I’m genuinely not trying to be an ass, just explaining the way I perceived the comments, I hope it’s not needed to say, but I meant no offense in my reply of your comment.

People in north Korea can vote too, is that “democratic”?

Digglet thumbs

The present models are, is the point i think the other person is making.

Obviously. Guess you all shoulda came up with a better candidate so that he wouldn’t have one a second time.

It’s easy when Elon messed with the voting machines, as well as racially targeted voters registration lists being purged, and gerrymandering districts.

I didn’t say it wasn’t an issue. You stated it as fact, and I said it wasn’t a fact. Because it’s not.

Cause he said it. That is known as a “fact”.

Still no proof that we won’t be able to vote in the next election. Do you any proof of constitutional changes or laws that say that we won’t be able to vote again in the next election? If not, then say you “think” we won’t be able to vote again. Because it’s your “opinion,” not fact. Right now there are no laws that say we won’t be able to vote in the next election.

My person. Trump has shown he doesn’t care about laws, or the constitution. Your argument is that it has to be on the books before its a problem, it doesn’t have to be a law. It’s easy to make it so that you can cast a ballot and have not count, that removes your ability to vote. The fact that he mentioned it should have you FURIOUS. The fact that he said he was going to run for a 3rd term should make you ANGRY. The fact that he’s ignoring the judiciary should have you out in the streets. Sitting there saying “well there’s no laws” is a semantics argument.

Nah, you all hated him then too. That’s why so much crying when you all lost to him a second time.

No shit we hate the felon con man. No one tried to kill though, only people that did were right wing nuts. Your lack of empathy to people crying when their lives are at risk is quite sad.

Again show me proof that we won’t be able to vote again. Someone saying something, or thinking about something, or laughing about something isn’t proof that it’s going to happen. 1Show me proof that there is a law or constitutional change that says we won’t be able to vote again. Or even a news article that says we won’t be able to vote again.

Again not an issue for you until it happens? Then what? It’s not an issue for you that the potus even hinted at this? What happens when you won’t be able to vote again? Is it a “oh no one told me?” Or a “oh well” for you? Just because there hasn’t been a law passed yet doesn’t mean he’s not a fascist dictator. He said it, and if that doesn’t bother you, it should.

I shared him saying it. And here is more for you.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-laura-ingraham-future-voting_n_66a85c2ae4b0e33a3bb7cd36

Maybe read all of the “I wish the shooter would have been a better shot” comments on Lemmy. Maybe that will tell you why.

First term vs running for 2nd. Not the same. Also he didn’t need to go to a fucking church to take a photo op.

He says a lot of shit. Doesn’t make it law or truth. So where is the proof that we won’t be able to vote again? Any changes made to the constitution? How come every single newspaper in the world isn’t reporting on the fact that we won’t be able to vote again?

Do you know what plans are? You can’t seriously not see the issue with this. Will this only matter once it happens, or the fact that he is even alluding to it. Nothing matters until it happens? That’s your argument? He doesn’t care about the constitution, see prior ignoring the 1st amendment, and ignoring the judiciary.

It was reported on. He keeps adding more and more bull shit. Are you unfamiliar with the concept of the news cycle? You are aware the major news orgs are owned by like 6 companies right?

https://www.webfx.com/blog/internet/the-6-companies-that-own-almost-all-media-infographic/

Your argument relies on selective incidents

Duh?

misinterpretations, lacking the comprehensive evidence needed to label Trump a fascist dictator.

Lol, no, making excuses for this shit heel requires super gold level mental gymnastics.

The claim that Trump used police to clear protesters for a photo op at St. John’s Church has been scrutinized. A U.S. watchdog found that the decision to clear the area was made to install fencing, not for the photo opportunity.

Sure thing. Why was he surrounded by guards for a clear photo op hahaha.

Please show me proof that we won’t be able to vote again

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/vote-four-years/

He literally said it.

Drugs suck. Including weed lol

I don’t care for drugs, but he’s talking about deporting us citizens.

Cope as you like.

Except for banning AP at press events disputes a judge ruling they are allowed to be there? Funny 1st amendment being upheld. Or using cops to force their way through protestors for an photo op? Free speech wasn’t upheld there.

If he were truly a fascist dictator, he would have dissolved Congress, taken control of the courts, and jailed opposition leaders. Which never happened.

All false none of that needs to happen for him to be a dictator, when all the gop cronies are aligned with him.

Labeling someone a fascist just because you interpret their rhetoric in the worst possible light is not logic, it’s bias disguised as argument.

How do you interpret that you won’t need to vote again? Or the home grows are next, or ignoring the judiciary as anything worse than the worst possible light? It’s only logical that these are the facts, and it’s not bias. Bias is ignoring, or defend these truths by plugging your ears.

No its not.

It’s not endorsing him based on labels its his fascist dictatorial actions that make him a fascist dictator.

You’re right about Suppression of free speech, that’s why he wanting to deport people who criticism him glad we agree he is against free speech.

I’m not calling him a fascist because I disagree or dislike him I am calling him one because he is. It’s logical. Fawning over and defending him is emotional, and lacking logic.