Makes me wonder if they’re linked with the spam accounts about changing flight tickets
Makes me wonder if they’re linked with the spam accounts about changing flight tickets
One of the important aspects that I haven’t seen mentioned yet is a sense of community. I’m currently in a online censorship country so can’t link it, but the ABC in Australia had a good podcast around QAnon.
Effectively there’s people who feel a lack of community/companionship locally and seek this out online.
Sorry to hear that bro.
This is surely satire right? Why’s everyone taking it so seriously?
The heck , why would you not use butter before the nutella?
Congratulations on your unpopular opinion. It’s an interesting point that clearly has hit a nerve with people. There’s a lot of “what-about-ism” in these comments.
I think the important take out of climate change is individually you don’t have to do everything (i.e. compost, put solar on, sell your car, avoid showering) but it is important that you do something that you can adjust in your life. If that’s deciding to not buy another pet after your current one passes, good for you. If pets are a fabric of your being, then maybe looking for carbon reduction solutions elsewhere would be beneficial.
and the farting is something you’ve totally conjured out of thin air. None of these details were in OP’s post
No joke, it’s called an example.
So seeing as we’re all on the same page re: staring being inappropriate. How long do you consider to be too long to look at someone? I wonder if that’s the same as OP. Theres nothing wrong with asking for more context if it can help people understand, because as everyone is saying, this seems unusual behavior and not acceptable…
Sorry, there’s more to the story
Nah I’m on this guy’s side. I think there needs to be more context. In most western countries it’s generally rude to stare. So is OP walking in to lectures late, is he farting loud as he’s walking, does he perceive a glance as staring too long… or actually do people in his area just stare too much ?
Further context is warranted to paint the picture.
I think you’re on the same page, but mean false negatives not false positive.
False negatives being the potential that you have the virus, but the scanner wasn’t able to identify it so returned a “you’re all clean” when in fact, you’ve got a dirty virus and should have listened in health class.
Is that bit the reason people listen to white noise? Seems counter intuitive
The fact that everyone here is all talking about needing guns to shoot people (self defense) and seeing that as a rationale statement is absolutely wild. You’re all so deep in that hot fucking mess you can’t see the forest for the guns.