I did “buy” (attention on the quotes) the anime Ghost in the Shell (1995) on Amazon Videos, this is my favorite animation, and I watch every year. I’ve DVDs, BlueRays and such, when I moved abroad bringing the devices to watch was a hurdle, so a online purchase was the dream. Guess who lost the access to this animation due to “contract reasons with the reseller, not with the customer”…

This was my spark to start a homelab. One step at the time. One day I’ll have everything that I need on my lab.

No, this is a bandaid in a broken bone, kind of solve the problem if you ignore the damage.

The schematics needs some love too. But I was already in the 4k words blogpost, and adding more on this would make the post waaaaay too long.

This is one of my critics. (Pun not inteded)

And with a simple fix. Allow the box.

And yet this isn’t a full problem. But when you have the quests as part of the game, I kind of expected a little bit more than the Pal Critic. These are very… boring, and have a simple fix. Allow the user to select a pal from the box.

The general loop is good, but the levelling is somewhat extreme, I’ve ignore some of the techs because I knew that in the next 5 min I would have unlocked the next tier. So it feels somewhat off.

It’s 4k words, it’s a critic with a good humor on it. But if you want a quick meme, sorry for the post. This is deeply related to program, and it’s a humorous post with a critic.

But looks like I’m off the target audience, which is on me for sure. But you can’t project your own lack of reading on the post.

edit, Did you read the post in this community before going to the post? Did you read the post? Looks like you may be missing, so I may have been a little too harsh in my assumption, in this case, I’m sorry.

What wasn’t funny? The idea? The critic? The message? What was the issue?

Yet this is my problem, A tool that “waste” tokens, is slow (with some tasks taking 30~40 minutes) and generating a result, while a model running locally can do the 70% in 5min. It’s a huge difference.

And don’t forget, at the end of the day, I would still need to look into the code and fix some stuff myself.

And if compared with Deepseek (which had fit best on my use case), it’s even faster like 1~3 minutes, to get on the 90% of the result, on a fraction of the cost. This is the points that I’m focused, and a enterprise should either understand that the market have changed, or pay the price. And looks like we will pay the price.

Thanks for the reading, the original post was somewhat unhinged. It was a very long debugging session for the alpha thing, the AI tooling weren’t helping. And I was losing my mind over my morning coffee. But I fixed the little details.

I think the reality of the AI tooling for coding fall in the “middle”, it isn’t the 10x or 100x described by people, it’s closer to a 10%~15% performance increase in my humble view. With some better harness (like the PI that I discovered) I think this can be sightly better, but far from the 50%. I would say that if the increase in productivity decays over time, the amount of code generated I had to refactor and clean for most of the week.

But for sure the Claude was a huge disappointment, very bad quality for it’s price, and super slow for the needs of a “start up mindset”, let’s put in this way.