If you need to revise I have a recording of it here.

I remember when that came out. I never saw it either for some reason, even though I had rented almost everything else in that video shop.

You cannot run it locally and have the same thing that oligarchs and big-tech have at their disposal.

“… and it continues in Palestine”.

223,000 people who are too comfortable with genocide

deleted by creator

Is also wonder about a guillotine on little wheels.

We never knew who might be calling. Now the phones tell you who is calling before you answer and still some people are freaked out. I don’t get it, but I think I’m becoming that way myself.

I was just thinking that one table might get a bit old, that’s great! Reminds me of the Neverputt game. Always loved those.

This looks really fun.

I remember what it’s like to share accommodation too.

That’s a good point. I’ve been voting for a party for years that started on 2-3% electoral preference. The general consensus at the time was that it would be nice to see them grow, but they’re a wasted vote. They’re now around 10-11% and even as opposition have impact.

We don’t have FPTP where I am, but I can see from our neighbours the kinds of problems it creates. Still, once you progress beyond FPTP, the kinds of attitude problems we have here still persist. I guess you’ll have a better idea of the next steps once you have proportional representation, because then you have a better idea of the government people really want.

I would also argue that few people have made a very good case connecting peoples concerns to capitalism. So to many it has a Southpark-ish ring to it: capitalism is bad. Don’t do capitalism. It’s an abstract thing, and abstract opponents make people feel despair and impotence.

The most persuasive people I’ve seen don’t use that word often. They directly link peoples concerns to inequality (unfair taxation and employment laws), climate ( fossil fuel companies) and unregulated abusive businesses such as big tech.

Those are not faceless, abstract entities, so people can organise their (justified) anger better.

Has anybody else heard good approaches for helping people understand ?

My theory is we prefer to treat obedient and servile objects as people, and actual people as unavoidable collateral.

A good traffic management plan acknowledges that when child predators slow down to look, it slows everyone else down too. /s

I couldn’t have said it better. Some people are genuinely not suited to it without other interventions first, but for everyone else, it’s basic mental hygiene.

The days of Having friends to make sketches like this with were so cool.

Is this real?

They knew