For an internal project that’s fine, and under semantic versioning you can basically break anything you like before v1.0.0 so it’s probably valid

Date based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y).

At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.

I think is the logic used for Linux kernel versioning so you’re in good company.

But everyone should really follow semantic versioning. It makes life so much easier.

Written in bash?! Superb effort but I can’t help wondering why you’d choose bash?

Which everyone will ignore.

Do websites come under the remit of self hosting?

Personally I host static websites with GitHub, cloudfront, netlify, onrender etc. Trivial to setup, more reliable and better cdn distribution. Anything dynamic lives in a data center rather than a self host setup.

Fair, but you were asking how people approach security for self hosted solutions and I guess I’m challenging why anything needs to be public. Self hosting is typically for your own services which can usually be hidden behind a VPN.

The exception I guess is email, but I never understand why people attempt self hosted mail servers

Don’t expose anything publicly, instead setup wireguard for every VM. Connect your phone, PC etc to the VPN so you have full access without publicly exposing anything.

You may have touched on this but your post was way too long so I only read the headings

Why do so many projects ignore semantic versioning? It’s so much easier to comprehend changes when versions are major, minor or patch

Is there a Lemmy community for /c/ShitAmericansSay

Actions have consequences. It’s important we have precedents that the world is just

Why would you want any of that in a text editor…?

But only, if you know what you are doing, or if you want to learn about it.

This is the crux of it though. Sure you can tweak your system but the average users doesn’t know what they are doing or where to learn more.

I’m not even convinced OP knows what problem they’re trying to solve

I tried to setup Loki but the documentation was atrocious. Everything was outdated, referring to tools that were marked deprecated but documentation for the replacements just didn’t exist.

Any idea how it’d look if broken down into distros? I’m assuming enterprise support would be favoured so Red Hat or Ubuntu would dominate?

I gave up on Rainbow Six as well. I didn’t really understand the plot.

Apparently I was meant to be on the side of Team America: World Police and not sympathise with the environmentalists trying to save the world from corruption and climate change.

I’m not convinced that immutable distros are beginner friendly yet.

Nobody has mentioned immutables yet?!

I finally dipped my toes into trying a new distro over the summer and have been really impressed with Project Bluefin. All the familiarity of Gnome for existing Ubuntu or Debian users but with a completely hands off rolling update experience.

The main drawbacks are the slight complexity of how the fuck to install stuff on an immutable system. In theory you use Homebrew for CLI apps and flatpak for GUI apps but I’m really not a fan of installing from sources other than the original dev.

I’m very intrigued by your definition of Liberalism. It doesn’t correlate with liberalism across the world.

Every nation should be inviting him for state dinners, banquets, golf tournaments, the works. Collectively keep his ego constantly jerked off and away from any advisors. Keep that going for four years and we might just distract the child enough.