• 0 Posts
  • 76 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Dialectical Materialism

    How about “a tug-of-war between owners and workers for jobs, resources, and technology”

    Three examples:

    Factory Work and Labour Unions

    Early 20th-century factory jobs involved long hours, low pay, and unsafe working conditions. When workers tried to unionize, factory owners often resisted, viewing unionized labour as a threat to profits. This created a direct conflict: owners wanting to keep costs low vs. workers demanding better wages and safer workplaces.

    Automation in Warehouses

    Warehouses (e.g., Amazon fulfilment centres) are increasingly adopting robotic systems to speed up sorting and packing. Employees might feel pressure to meet higher performance metrics set by a partly automated workflow, while also fearing that further automation will reduce human jobs. Here, the “tug-of-war” is between technological efficiency (and profit) vs. workers’ job security and well-being.

    Tech Industry Outsourcing

    Companies sometimes outsource tech-related jobs to countries with cheaper labour costs. This lowers expenses for the company but can lead to local layoffs and economic hardship for employees in higher-wage regions. The conflict revolves around the benefit of increased profit margins for the company vs. the material needs of domestic workers who lose their livelihoods.


  • The USA actually spends several billions, if not trillions on Medicare (meant for the old) and Medicaid (meant for the poor, and single mothers, and young children) combined.

    In 2023, the federal government spent about $848.2 billion on Medicare, accounting for 14% of total federal spending.

    source - and that’s just Medicare.

    I agree with you that it’s weird that corporations get a bailout, instead of selling the company to competitors, but no need to act like the USA doesn’t spend a TON of money on its citizens, keeping their head above water :)



  • Let me tell you that it has been socially unacceptable to make apologies for anyone who flew the Nazi flag ever since 1945.

    Yes, I understand you’re trying to take a nuanced approach to the Nazis who had been drafted since being kids, etc, but just don’t.

    History already happened, and the last of the original Nazis are slowly dieing out (youngest Nazis tended to be 16 years old, so 1945-16 = born in 1929, so they’d be about 96 years old). They don’t need a random stranger to try to defend them.

    Nazism is a failed ideology that abused large parts of the world. It doesn’t need defending.