To each their own, I suppose. I prefer having the info generally available, so I can find various accounts of an event and form my own opinions. If the information is actively suppressed, it’s a lot more difficult to find out what really happened than if the info is available but some sources are (heavily) biased.

I didn’t say it was perfect or even unbiased, just that it’s better than denying something happened or refusing to talk about it.

How about a more apt comparison to the type of stuff DeepSeek has gone viral for censoring?