Sure, but you need someone who is inspired by it to have played it to be so. Dont get me wrong I also agree with things existing for the sake of it but thats also up to someone inspired enough.

I think its on the individual to not be responsible to spread themselves out but to actually interact with their niche and keep it alive, I want the games I engage with to be engaged with so that its felt.

I dont think art needs my support as much as people do.

I just type random words into the search bar and see what comes back, the mystery key bundles gave me frog detective 1 to many times.

But now I’m playing a fun gnome game so I am pretty happy with my method.

So like UFO 50? We just need basically demo jams in a packaged form factor

The problem is “passive”. Its not helpful to a game developer to not play their games cause then no one engages with their art. I wouldnt want to pay for a musician I dont listen to.

We do need a way to discover stuff easier. That was one of the joys of the early internet compared to now. But if you want to support indie devs, follow them or find smaller stuff and support it. Ignore the algorithms, decide what you want and look for it. Life isn’t passive.

Do it for the love of the game

No, it’s very different. You should definitely be able to justify bombing a building, you need less to justify double check that others aren’t being hurt by a bully.

Fun fact! As long as the soap inside the dispenser works as it should it literally doesnt matter if it is touch or how covered in germs it is.

I understand fighting fire with fire, but dont mind me while I dont praise the arsonists.

Both sides are getting their clippable audio snippets and dragging around audiences to feel like they are fighting with them.

I truly don’t agree that platforming extremists to argue against them for publicity and money is ever worth it. The sides lean against each other to grow larger and these are people who it is in their financial interests to not change their opinion. And religion debates are not productive, those are personal and faith based. Can’t argue someone rationally out of something that wasnt rationally entered.

You asked about qnaline, not Tucker.

Not directly but I will call it an homage to it. Cause they are still platforming the extremists.

Its why no one thought Bill Nye’s debates with creationists were a good idea.

I clicked on it and the first video recommended was a thumbnail of two guys sitting in front of microphones looking like that last image with the title “the bible is true cause it says so?”

So… Yes. Very much so.

Same, the first moment I saw this gremlin I knew I was gonna have to defend some f-ed up stuff.
I just love these comics.

You know what? I think I have heard that recently?

Yeah that was the takeaway and the ick factor I had initially.

Like if they played up the absurdism and had a joke more than “well now I’m horny, but pretending I’m upset even though I made the joke” I think there could have been something. The whole set up for that… Yeesh.

Alright I think I got over the ick factor enough to just see this as a pretty good answer to this.

Listen

Read

Oh man if only…

But let me loop back to you about this when we figure out our org goals

I just miss people talking about something they know in an organized and professional manner.

I just don’t care for random string of consciousness to pretend I am part of a conversation I can’t actually participate in.

See above comic.