KmlSlmk64

There are also the move semantics in C++, which are similar to Rust’s ownership transfer, but explicit and with some differences in how the data is actually handled under the hood

Well but as far as I am aware Lemmy has no fiduciary responsibility, as it is not a corporation, is open source and uses a web standard to communicate. Therefore there is no requirement for instance server managers to use the “official” version of Lemmy and could refuse to implement anti-user features, like specific app requirements. So I would say it would be really really hard to enshittificate Lemmy, if not borderline impossible, because users would just use their own fork, which would still be interoperable.

If someone really wanted to add it, probably the best would be to use unless

What I mean, is that you made me realize what they actually meant, because I’ve read it as is.

I actually now understand what was meant, because of your comment! I was like Why do they want to receive socialistic agenda later? Incredible what difference a wrong a/e can make! (I’m a non native english speaker, but I think it bothers me/I see it more than the actual natives)

The only problem is if you accidentally include some personal information or other type you don’t want to be out there and you’ve edited it out, you probably don’t want it to be accessible.

Google Greek question mark 😁