Both?

Maybe they reuse the bags. Bag up 5th Street, salt it, collect the bags and prep 6th.

Definitely drink milk from the bottom of your bag though, that’s fine and normal.

That’s a great teacher. Refusing to teach a technology only leads to poor use. Even if one thinks it’s a poor technology, teach THAT instead of just black boxing the topic. The bottle is open, the genie is out. Better to teach how to make legally airtight wishes than to ban wishmaking.

“clearly wasn’t”

I see now, you just phrase things abruptly in a way that SEEMS rude but clearly isn’t. My mistake. Have a nice day.

Fair enough.

Not sure why you phrased that as correcting them when you were agreeing and adding to it.

Superman could do it. Spiderman could not.

I refuse to update.

That’s good news, that means we should quadruple their funding. As long as we have impossible goals, let’s really go for it. I think the right person could convince the voters these are good ideas, if we could find someone proletariat enough to endorse them and run on that platform. Bourgeoisie politicians can’t support it because their donors make bank off a crippled government.

Then we should enable BLM to do these things we the people would like our governments to do with our tax money

If they never discovered Any Rand there would not be the quantity of discussion regarding her, regardless of quality. Books that don’t get read don’t get judged. Her works and life were appealing to people who support a certain philosophy. They have positive discussion of her and her works. Those who disagree are not likely bother to discuss her failings at length, if others did not praise her. She would merely be obscure and bad, rather than well known and bad.

Seems like there’s a souvenir factor cooked into the pricing of the sauce

You clearly know more about this than I do, and you’ve thought a lot about it. Your points deserve a better response than I can give at this time, but I wanted to acknowledge that at least. I also wanted to say you aren’t pedantic and I’m sorry I said that. You spent time and thought on making a good conversation and I wish I had been more engaging with that instead of trying to be correct. Thank you for still conversing instead of arguing even after I was less than perfect of a conversation partner. I hope in the future I see more of your comments. Have a really nice day.

You’re right, you are being pedantic.

Edit: Actual response. You took time to type all that out, I should at least say why I disagree.

WINE is a compatibility layer. A translator. It helps a non-native language speaker speak the native language. The whole reason WINE exists is to make a non-native executable execute outside of its native environment. Even if the code is very functionally similar to something like .NET, the function of WINE is to enable non-native code to run as though it were designed for Linux. Downloading WINE doesn’t suddenly make those .EXE files be retroactively designed with Linux in mind. It’s still not native code.

I don’t know.

Underground marionettes?

Windows does what Nintendon’t? Wait, that’s not it…

That is correct, but a compatibility layer is also not native execution of a binary.

Wait, 11 tastes like goat barn and frankincense?